04.02.2015 Views

Dictionary of Evidence-based Medicine.pdf

Dictionary of Evidence-based Medicine.pdf

Dictionary of Evidence-based Medicine.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 <strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Evidence</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong><br />

repeating <strong>of</strong> essential messages; (viii) provision <strong>of</strong> positive reinforcements<br />

in follow-up visits (Samurai SB A, Avon J (1990) Principles <strong>of</strong> educational<br />

outreach (academic detailing) to improve clinical decision making. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the American Medical Association. 263: 549-56).<br />

ACBS (see Advisory Committee on Borderline Substances)<br />

Activities <strong>of</strong> daily living<br />

This term refers to measures <strong>of</strong> independence in the performance <strong>of</strong> five<br />

major personal care activities, specifically: bathing, dressing, eating, getting<br />

in and out <strong>of</strong> bed and using the toilet. Assessment <strong>of</strong> impairment <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

function is <strong>of</strong>ten undertaken using scales constructed from the five<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> daily living (Patrick DL, Erickson P (1993) Health status and<br />

health policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford).<br />

Acquiescence response set<br />

This term refers to the tendency <strong>of</strong> respondents to agree with statements<br />

<strong>of</strong> opinion regardless <strong>of</strong> content. For example, it is well known that in<br />

research aiming to gauge patient perception (e.g. patient satisfaction questionnaires),<br />

respondents to questionnaires sometimes respond positively to<br />

pairs <strong>of</strong> contradictory statements. Indeed, a small proportion <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />

are known to agree with all or nearly all items on questionnaires used<br />

in such studies. Such poor internal consistency therefore needs to be<br />

accounted for if the results <strong>of</strong> the studies are to be meaningful. Exclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> acquiescent patients prior to analysis is not justifiable as a new source <strong>of</strong><br />

bias may be introduced in the selection <strong>of</strong> such individuals. Moreover,<br />

restricting analysis to the subset <strong>of</strong> respondents from which acquiescent<br />

responders have been eliminated would reduce the external validity or<br />

generalizability <strong>of</strong> the results as acquiescent individuals are <strong>of</strong>ten from<br />

socioeconomic disadvantaged groups. The use <strong>of</strong> balance scales (i.e. scales<br />

which include items which express both favourable and unfavourable<br />

items) is recommended to minimize bias introduced by acquiescent<br />

response set.<br />

Adaptive design<br />

An adaptive design is a type <strong>of</strong> clinical trial design in which the probability<br />

that a patient receives a given treatment is, at least partly, determined by<br />

the results obtained with patients so far. An example <strong>of</strong> such a design is the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!