07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF <strong>NATIONAL</strong> <strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>RELATIONS</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />

• The Board in its conclusions described the pervasive character<br />

and extent of the respondent's conduct in interfering with the selforaanization<br />

of its employees as follows :<br />

From the facts as presented above it is clear that the association was brought<br />

into being originally at the instigation of, and under the guidance of, the<br />

respondent. Since its resurrection, the respondent has continually interfered<br />

with the administration of the association and contributed encouragement and<br />

support to it. Meetings of the association have been and are being held on the<br />

respondent's property during working hours. Solicitation for membership in<br />

the association has been permitted during working hours, and the privilege of<br />

similar solicitation has been in effect denied to members of Local No. 502.<br />

In at least two instances, the respondent has aided the association financially.<br />

The respondent has, in various ways as above indicated, through the press and<br />

through the distribution of circulars, contributed support to the association by<br />

openly declaring its antagonism and opposition to Local No. 502. Through its<br />

encouragement and aid to the association the respondent clearly intended to<br />

interfere with the self-organization of its employees in Local No. 502 or any<br />

other bona fide labor organization. The respondent has aided in the intimidation<br />

and coercion of its employees to join the association. It encouraged membership<br />

in the association by assuring its members that none of them would<br />

lose by removal of part of its plant to Johnsonburg. It climaxed its support<br />

to the association by recognizing it as the exclusive representative of its<br />

employees and by signing an agreement with it pursuant to such recognition.<br />

The Board ordered the respondent to cease and desist from such<br />

activities and from giving effect to its contract with the association.<br />

It further ordered the respondent to withdraw recognition from the<br />

association as a representative of its employees and to disestablish it<br />

as such representative.<br />

Matter of eating Rope -Works, Inc.," similarly illustrates the<br />

numerous activities of the employer which led to his domination of<br />

a labor organization. The case has an added significance because it is<br />

typical of the six cases 77 decided during the last fiscal year in which<br />

the Board has found that an employer has dominated and interfered<br />

with a labor organization after receiving the advice of L. L. Balleisen,<br />

industrial secretary of the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce<br />

In the Cating Rope Works case, immediately after an organizer<br />

for a genuine union had requested an appointment for collective<br />

bargaining, the respondent called a meeting of its employees and<br />

suggested that they consider the desirability of a company union.<br />

On the following day the respondent's vice president consulted L. L.<br />

Balleisen, who furnished him with the forms for the organization<br />

of a company union. The respondent later called another meeting<br />

of its employees at ,which the respondent's officials disparaged the<br />

organizers of the legitimate union and served notice that they would<br />

not sign a contract with any "outside" union. The respondent's vice<br />

president, reading from a statement prepared by Balleisen, announced<br />

that the respondent would enter into a contract with a committee of<br />

employees and the employees individually, but that it would not sign<br />

a contract with any union. The statement contained an outline of the<br />

16 Matter of eating Rope Works, Inc., and Teotile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />

C. I. 0., 4 N. L. R. B. 1100.<br />

"In addition to Matter of eating Rope Works, Inc., supra, the cases are Matter of<br />

Metropolitan Engineering Company and Metropolitan Device Corporation and United Electrical<br />

and Radio Workers of America, Local No. 1203, 4 N. • L. R. B. 542; Matter of The<br />

Jacobs Bros. Co., Inc., and United Electrical and Radio Workers of America, Local No. 1226,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 620; Matter of David E. Kennedy, Inc., and Isidore Greenberg, 6 N. L. R. B.<br />

699; Matter of Art Crayon Company, Inc., and Its Affiliated Company, American Artists<br />

Color Works, Inc., and United Artists Supply Workers, 7 N. L. R. B. 102; Matter of<br />

National Licorice Company and Bakery and Confectionery 'Workers International Union of<br />

America, Local Union 405, Greater New York and Vioinity, 7 N. L. R. B. 537.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!