07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170 THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF <strong>NATIONAL</strong> .<strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>RELATIONS</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />

union, among the pattern makers, and among the employees in the foundries, to<br />

determine the desires of these men as to unit is unnecessary and would cause<br />

unwarranted confusion. Upon the showing made at the hearing, the result of<br />

such elections would be a foregone conclusion.<br />

As to two crafts, however, the Board found that a substantial number<br />

of employees had evinced a desire for separate representation, and<br />

consequently it directed the holding of separate elections for these<br />

groups.31<br />

Separate elections may also be denied where the circumstances do<br />

not present sufficient reasons for finding that the group in which such<br />

an election is requested could be aptly considered a separate unit. In<br />

Matter of American Hardware Corporation,32 where the Board directed<br />

the holding of separate elections as to one group of employees,<br />

it stated with regard to another group of employees:<br />

The I. A. M. also contended that the header department at the Corbin Screw<br />

plant constituted a separate unit. This department is composed of specialist<br />

machinists engaged in making the heads for screws. The, Corbin Screw plant<br />

is the only ooie of the fowr plants in New Britain that has such a department.<br />

There are, however<br />

'<br />

specialist machinists of many other types eligible to membership<br />

in the I. A. M. employed both at the Corbin Screw plant and at the<br />

other plants of the Company. The machinists in the header department are no<br />

more highly skilled than the other specialist machinists, and the I. A. M. made<br />

no contention that all specialist machinists constitute an appropriate unit. Further<br />

there is no history of collective bargaining by the header department as a<br />

separate unit, and no reason appears for separating those employees from the<br />

other specialist machinists who are to be included in the industrial unit. We<br />

therefore find that the header department does not constitute a separate unit<br />

for the purposes of collective bargaining and that the employees of that department<br />

are part of the industrial unit.'<br />

The Board has also held that where it is contended that certain<br />

skilled groups should be set aside from other workers in a plant because<br />

of the nature of their work, it will not permit a single election<br />

for all of the skilled employees on a semi-industrial basis. Thus, in<br />

Matter of Schick Dry 'Shaver Com,pany, 34 one union was organized<br />

on an industrial basis, and another union, which admitted as its members<br />

employees within a particular craft, had also been designated<br />

as bargaining representative by employees in two other crafts. The<br />

Board directed separate elections for each of the crafts, although the<br />

names of the same unions were placed on all of the ballots. The<br />

Board said:<br />

The fact that the carpenters and electricians in the maintenance department<br />

are also the most highly skilled ba their respective trade classification does not,<br />

a A similar result was reached in Matter of American Hardware Corporation and<br />

United Electrical and Radio Workers of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 412; and Matter of Shell<br />

Oil Company and International Association of Oil Field, Gas Well and Refinery Workers of<br />

America, 7 N. L. R. B. 417. In the first of these, the Board found that four plants<br />

constituted a single appropriate unit. Consequently, while a separate election was proper<br />

where a craft union had organized employees in all of the plants, such an election would<br />

would not be held where a craft union had not succeeded in more than one plant, and<br />

consequently represented only a negligible minority of the employees who were eligible to<br />

join it. In the second, four separate elections were directed, as agreed on by the parties.<br />

It was also claimed that the company's plumbers constituted a separate appropriate unit.<br />

There was doubt as to whether a unit for plumbers would number 341 employees or 645,<br />

as claimed by the industrial union involved. The Board stated that it was not necessary<br />

to decide this question since even if the smaller number was chosen, the craft union had<br />

shown that it had at most 40 members.<br />

=Matter of American Hardware Corporation and United Electrical and Radio Workers<br />

of America, 4 N. L. R.. B. 412.<br />

a See also Matter of Standard Oil Company of California and 0i/ Workers International<br />

Union, Local 299, 5 N. L. R. B. 750; and Matter of Consolidated Afreraft Corporation and<br />

International Union, United Automobile Workers of America, Local No. 508, C. I. 0., 7<br />

N. L. B. B. 1061.<br />

84 Matter of Schick Dry Shaver Company and Lodge No. 1557, International Association<br />

of Machinists, 4 N. L. R. B. 246.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!