NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WI. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 77<br />
convinced by the record before us that this announcement was not so regarded<br />
by the strikers. The evidence does not show that they were deterred from<br />
applying for their jobs by reason of these assertions of Swiren. On the contrary,<br />
it was well known throughout the strikers' ranks that the respondent was<br />
taking back many of those who had occupied the plant. As a matter of fact<br />
the respondent did reinstate 35 of the sit-down strikers, or over one-third of<br />
the total. Emissaries of the respondent were actively seeking out individual<br />
strikers and imploring them to return to work. At the same time, the evidence<br />
clearly shows that the position of practically all of those strikers who did not<br />
go back, and who are named in the complaint, was that they were determined<br />
to stay out until the Union reached a settlement with the respondent.<br />
In Matter of American Manufacturing Concern," upon receiving<br />
information that a strike was about to start, the employer notified the<br />
employees that a walk-out would automatically sever their employment.<br />
As the men walked out, they were instructed to surrender<br />
their time cards. The Board dismissed the section 8 (3) complaint<br />
upon the ground that the purported discharge was not real but merely<br />
tactical, saying:<br />
As we have previously observed, such statements are primarily intended, not<br />
to effectuate a discharge, but as a tactical step designed to coerce the employees<br />
into resuming work or to defer those remaining at work from going out on<br />
strike."<br />
However, the action taken by the employer may operate as an effective<br />
discharge which prevents the employee from resuming work<br />
upon the termination of the strike. Whether the employer's behavior<br />
is a mere "tactical step" or constitutes an effective discharge depends<br />
on all the circumstances in the case.45<br />
In Matter of Kaeh,ne Manufacturing Com,pany," the employer operated<br />
plants in two towns, 60 miles apart; the employees in one of<br />
the two plants went on strike and enrolled in a union ; thereupon the<br />
employer notified all the employees in the struck plant by letter that<br />
it had abandoned operations at the plant, advised them to seek employment<br />
elsewhere, and served notice of the cancelation of their<br />
group insurance policies; the employer moved part of the machinery<br />
to the other plant and sold another portion, though it still retained<br />
the buildings. Operations at the other plant were increased from<br />
day shift to steady day and night shift with augmented force. On<br />
these facts the Board found a discriminatory lock-out. 47 In its consequences,<br />
an unequivocal assumption of a position by an employer<br />
during a strike or lay-off not to resume the normal employer status<br />
upon the termination of the strike or lay-off, because of discrimina-<br />
48 matter of American Manufacturing Concern and Local No. 6, Organized Furniture<br />
Workers, 7 N. L. R. 13. 753.<br />
The Board held this "tactical step" in violation of section 8 (1).<br />
'° Whether the employer's purported discharge or purported refusal to reinstate Is a<br />
mere "tactical step" or a genuine declaration, it can have no effect on the employee's<br />
status as conferred upon the employee by section 2 (3) of the act. In Matter of Carli,sle<br />
Lumber Company and Lumber and Sawmill Workers' Union, Local 2511. etc., 2 N. L. R. B.<br />
248, enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Carliale Lumber Company. 94 F. (2d)<br />
138 (C. C. A. 9th, 1937). certiorari denied, 304 U. S. 575. 1938. the Board stated : "The<br />
respondent by its notice of discharge sought to alter its legal relationship to these employees.<br />
This it was powerless to do under the Act, without their consent * • • Under Section<br />
2 of subsection 3 of the Act an employee whose work has ceased as a consequence of or<br />
in connection with a labor dispute retains his employee status as long as such labor dispute<br />
remains current and as long as he has not obtained regular and substantially equivalent<br />
employment." See also National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio d Telegraph<br />
Company, 304 U. S. 333 (1938). enforcing Matter of Mackay Radio d Telegraph. Company,<br />
etc.. and American Radio Telegraphists' Association, etc., 1 N. r,. R. B. 201.<br />
46 Matter of Knehne Manufneturina Company and Local No. 1791, United Brotherhood<br />
of Carpenters and Joiners of America. 7 N. L. R. B. 304.<br />
" See also cases cited below, pp. 79. 80, notes 59-63.