07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WI. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 77<br />

convinced by the record before us that this announcement was not so regarded<br />

by the strikers. The evidence does not show that they were deterred from<br />

applying for their jobs by reason of these assertions of Swiren. On the contrary,<br />

it was well known throughout the strikers' ranks that the respondent was<br />

taking back many of those who had occupied the plant. As a matter of fact<br />

the respondent did reinstate 35 of the sit-down strikers, or over one-third of<br />

the total. Emissaries of the respondent were actively seeking out individual<br />

strikers and imploring them to return to work. At the same time, the evidence<br />

clearly shows that the position of practically all of those strikers who did not<br />

go back, and who are named in the complaint, was that they were determined<br />

to stay out until the Union reached a settlement with the respondent.<br />

In Matter of American Manufacturing Concern," upon receiving<br />

information that a strike was about to start, the employer notified the<br />

employees that a walk-out would automatically sever their employment.<br />

As the men walked out, they were instructed to surrender<br />

their time cards. The Board dismissed the section 8 (3) complaint<br />

upon the ground that the purported discharge was not real but merely<br />

tactical, saying:<br />

As we have previously observed, such statements are primarily intended, not<br />

to effectuate a discharge, but as a tactical step designed to coerce the employees<br />

into resuming work or to defer those remaining at work from going out on<br />

strike."<br />

However, the action taken by the employer may operate as an effective<br />

discharge which prevents the employee from resuming work<br />

upon the termination of the strike. Whether the employer's behavior<br />

is a mere "tactical step" or constitutes an effective discharge depends<br />

on all the circumstances in the case.45<br />

In Matter of Kaeh,ne Manufacturing Com,pany," the employer operated<br />

plants in two towns, 60 miles apart; the employees in one of<br />

the two plants went on strike and enrolled in a union ; thereupon the<br />

employer notified all the employees in the struck plant by letter that<br />

it had abandoned operations at the plant, advised them to seek employment<br />

elsewhere, and served notice of the cancelation of their<br />

group insurance policies; the employer moved part of the machinery<br />

to the other plant and sold another portion, though it still retained<br />

the buildings. Operations at the other plant were increased from<br />

day shift to steady day and night shift with augmented force. On<br />

these facts the Board found a discriminatory lock-out. 47 In its consequences,<br />

an unequivocal assumption of a position by an employer<br />

during a strike or lay-off not to resume the normal employer status<br />

upon the termination of the strike or lay-off, because of discrimina-<br />

48 matter of American Manufacturing Concern and Local No. 6, Organized Furniture<br />

Workers, 7 N. L. R. 13. 753.<br />

The Board held this "tactical step" in violation of section 8 (1).<br />

'° Whether the employer's purported discharge or purported refusal to reinstate Is a<br />

mere "tactical step" or a genuine declaration, it can have no effect on the employee's<br />

status as conferred upon the employee by section 2 (3) of the act. In Matter of Carli,sle<br />

Lumber Company and Lumber and Sawmill Workers' Union, Local 2511. etc., 2 N. L. R. B.<br />

248, enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Carliale Lumber Company. 94 F. (2d)<br />

138 (C. C. A. 9th, 1937). certiorari denied, 304 U. S. 575. 1938. the Board stated : "The<br />

respondent by its notice of discharge sought to alter its legal relationship to these employees.<br />

This it was powerless to do under the Act, without their consent * • • Under Section<br />

2 of subsection 3 of the Act an employee whose work has ceased as a consequence of or<br />

in connection with a labor dispute retains his employee status as long as such labor dispute<br />

remains current and as long as he has not obtained regular and substantially equivalent<br />

employment." See also National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio d Telegraph<br />

Company, 304 U. S. 333 (1938). enforcing Matter of Mackay Radio d Telegraph. Company,<br />

etc.. and American Radio Telegraphists' Association, etc., 1 N. r,. R. B. 201.<br />

46 Matter of Knehne Manufneturina Company and Local No. 1791, United Brotherhood<br />

of Carpenters and Joiners of America. 7 N. L. R. B. 304.<br />

" See also cases cited below, pp. 79. 80, notes 59-63.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!