07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 173<br />

The practice of giving controlling weight to the desires of a majority<br />

of the employees m a craft., where there is a dispute between<br />

proponents of craft and industrial forms of organization, has met<br />

with the disapproval of one member of the Board. In several cases<br />

in which the doctrine of the Globe case has been applied, Mr. Edwin S.<br />

Smith has dissented from the conclusion reached by the majority of<br />

the Board, and in other cases, he has concurred only in the result.<br />

In Matter of Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, 41 Mr. Smith<br />

said, in a dissenting opinion :<br />

I cannot concur in this decision, because, under all the circumstances, I feel<br />

the Board is here abandoning its necessary judicial function under the act of<br />

making a reasonable determination of the appropriate bargaining unit in accordance<br />

with the facts of the particular case.<br />

The decision vests in the hands of a small group of employees the choice of<br />

determining whether in this mass-production plant, employing nearly 10,000<br />

workers, a complete industrial unit, or one from which one or more crafts have<br />

been severed, is most appropriate to promote collective bargaining. * * *<br />

Permitting minorities to set themselves off, as all the indications are they would<br />

do in this instance, succeeds in providing full self-determination for the minority<br />

but only at the expense of entirely disregarding the interests of the majority.<br />

The statute states that the Board shall decide in each case the appropriate<br />

bargaining unit "in order to insure to employees the full benefit of their right to<br />

self-organization and to collective bargaining and to otherwise effectuate the<br />

policies of this act." Among other things, the policies of the act are clearly<br />

aimed at establishing that form of collective bargaining which will be most<br />

likely to lead to industrial stability and peace. Having in mind the broad<br />

purposes of the act, the appropriate unit in this„ as in other cases, must be<br />

decided on the particular facts presented.<br />

Aside from separate bargaining by organized craft groups for a short time<br />

many years ago, the whole recent and significant history of sentiment regarding<br />

collective bargaining in the Allis-Chalmers plant points to the emergence<br />

of the industrial type union as the choice of the overwhelming mass of the<br />

employees. * * *<br />

* * * If the oilers and firemen and the skilled maintenance electricians<br />

bargain separately, by so much is the united economic strength of the employees<br />

as a whole weakened. Anything which weakens the bargaining power<br />

of the employees will tend to lessen reliance upon peaceful collective bargaining<br />

as the means for achieving the workers' economic ends. Such a tendency<br />

is plainly contrary to the purposes of the act.°<br />

Mr. Smith has concurred in the result of other decisions of the<br />

Board which applied the doctrine of the Globe case, where no union<br />

claimed a majority in an industrial unit," or where there had been<br />

a course of separate collective bargaining on behalf of the craft<br />

employees in question. 44 In Matter of American Hardware Corporation,<br />

45 Mr. Smith concurred in a separate opinion, as follows :<br />

Although other facts on which this decision is based would seem to indicate<br />

that the industrial unit is here the one most appropriate to achieve the pur-<br />

41 Matter of Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company and International Union, United<br />

Automobile Workers of America, Local 248, 4 N. L. R. B. 159. The facts of this case are<br />

described above In this section.<br />

4° Mr. Smith also dissented in the following cases: Matter of Schick Dry Shaver Company<br />

and Lodge No. 1557, International Association of Machinists, 4 N. L. R. B. 246;<br />

Matter of Worthington Pump and Machinery Corp. and Pattern Makers Association of<br />

New York and Vicinity, Pattern Makers League, 4 N. L. R. B. 448; Matter of Combustion<br />

Engineering Company, Inc. and Steel Workers Organizing Committee, etc., 5 N. L. R. B.<br />

344; Matter of Armour d Company and International Association of Machinists, Local 92,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 535; Matter of Joseph S. Pinch i Co., Inc. and United Distillery Workers<br />

Union, Local No. 3, 7 N. L. R. B. 1; and Matter of Fairbanks, Morse d Company and<br />

Pattern Makers Association of Beloit, 7 N. L. R. B. 229.<br />

43 Matter of Waterbury Manufacturing Company and International Association of<br />

Machinists, Local 1335, 5 N. L. R. B. 288.<br />

"Matter matter of Shell Chemical Company and Oil Workers International Union, etc. 4<br />

N. L. R. B. 259; Matter of American Hardware Corporation and United Electrical and<br />

Radio Workers of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 412.<br />

Matter of American Hardware Corporation and United Electrical and Radio Workers<br />

of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 412.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!