07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISFIED 63<br />

The nine tippers were unorganized and could not be represented by a labor<br />

organization in the presentation of their grievances. The stoppage engaged<br />

in by them was a spontaneous expression of discontent staged for the purpose<br />

of bringing to the attention of the respondent the grievance concerning wages<br />

which repeated talks with their forelady had failed to remedy.<br />

The discharges were held to constitute interference, restrain, and<br />

coercion of the employees in the exercise of their right to engage in<br />

concerted activities for the purposes of collective bargaining and<br />

other mutual aid or protection.<br />

In the Matter of Carlisle Dumber Company," striking employees<br />

were notified that unless they made application for work by a certain<br />

day, the company would evict them from their company-owned<br />

homes. The Board found this action exceptionally coercive, because<br />

all dwellings in the town were owned by the company and no other<br />

shelter was available. In Matter of Hercules-Campbell Body Co.,<br />

Inc.,56 wages were increased by the company after it refused to negotiate<br />

with the union regarding such increase. At the time the increase<br />

was announced the employees were told by the company president<br />

that a union was unnecessary. The Board found a violation<br />

and stated:<br />

It is clear that, after the failure of the Union committee to secure an increase<br />

in wages, Campbell's announcement of a general wage increase, coupled with<br />

his statements concerning the futility of unions, was intended, at least in part,<br />

as striking proof of these and his previous statements regarding the positive<br />

benefits of not having a union at the respondent's plant.<br />

In Matter of Waterman Steamship Corporation, 5' the company's<br />

refusal to allow solicitation of membership by one union on board<br />

its ships, while permitting a rival union to do so, was held a violation,<br />

the discrimination having "the necessary effect of impeding its employees<br />

in the free choice of representatives." In Matter of Brown<br />

Shoe Company, Inc.," the company arbitrarily abrogated a contract<br />

with the union which represented the union's "outstanding achievement<br />

in collective bargaining." The Board found that the employer's<br />

act "in the light of the background situation * * * is to be<br />

interpreted only as a blow aimed directly at the union. Consequently,<br />

the respondent's termination of the arrangement without conferring<br />

with the union constitutes interference, restraint, and coercion of its<br />

Salem plant employees in the exercise of their right to collective<br />

bargaining guaranteed by the Act."<br />

&s hatter of Carlisle Lumber Company and Lumber d Sawmill Workers' Union, 2 N. L. R. B.<br />

248, order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 94 F. (2d)<br />

138 (C. C. A. 9th, 1937), certiorari denied, 304 II. S. 575.<br />

coo Matter of Hercules Campbell Body Co., Ino., and United Automobile Workers of America,<br />

7 N. L. R. B. 431. In enforcing an order of the Board under section 8 (2) in another<br />

case, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals observed : "The finding that the Allied Chemical<br />

Workers' Association did not succeed in freeing itself from employer domination is supported<br />

by the evidence. For more than a year following passage of the Act, the Associatibn<br />

made some attempts to gain better wages and to relieve the unsatisfactory housing situation<br />

in Trona. These moves were for the most part fruitless until concessions on both<br />

matters were made by respondent in April 1936, the high point of the Borax and Potash<br />

Workers' Union organizing campaign. The Board justly inferred that such success, coming<br />

after a long period of chronic inability to bargain successfully, was due to respondent's<br />

desire to head off the American Federation of Labor anion rather than to any pressure<br />

from the Association." National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash and Chemical<br />

Corporation, 98 F. (2d) 488 (C. C. A. 9th, 1938), enforcing order of 'Board in American<br />

Potash and Chemical Corporation and Allied Chemical Workers Association of Trona,<br />

California, 3 N. L. R. B. 140.<br />

5T Matter of Waterman Steamship Corporation and National Marititne Union of America,<br />

7 N. L R. B. 237.<br />

as Matter of Brown Shoe Company, Inc., and Boot and Shoe Workers' Union, 1 N. L. R. B.<br />

803.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!