07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 53<br />

him constantly and make reports to the company concerning his<br />

union activities; other detectives were sent to attend union meetings<br />

and conventions; still others were given union leaflets and circulars<br />

for investigational purposes.°<br />

Espionage, is not, however, limited to the activities of professional<br />

spies employed for such purposes. At times regular employees have<br />

been directed or encouragtd by the employer to report upon the union<br />

membership or activities of their fellow workers. Such action by the<br />

employer also is violative of section 8 (1). In some cases the evidence<br />

establishes quite a comprehensive and efficient system maintained<br />

by the employer for keeping himself informed of the progress<br />

of the union and of its officers. Thus in Matter of Agwilines, Iiw.,7<br />

detailed reports on union activities in the various branch offices of<br />

the company were regularly made and transmitted to the general<br />

office which determined the company's labor policy.° In other cases,<br />

while no such system existed, individual employees were utilized on<br />

occasion for spying purposes.°<br />

Perhaps the most common type of espionage which appears in the<br />

cases is that engaged in by company supervisory or managerial employees,<br />

and officials. Such employees and officials have been found<br />

to post themselves at points of vantage near union meetings in order<br />

to note the identity of employees who attended. 1° In Matter of Boss<br />

Manufacturing Company a foreman repeatedly importuned an employee<br />

to give him information about the union's activities, but the<br />

employee refused. The Board found that the attempted procurement<br />

of such information, though unsuccessful, was a violation of section<br />

8 (1).<br />

2. BRIBERY<br />

Bribery or attempted bribery of employees, as an antiunion weapon,<br />

has been found in a number of cases. The Board has condemned<br />

such practice as a violation of section 8 (1). In some instances company<br />

officials have openly offered bribes to union leaders in an<br />

attempt to induce them to cease their union activities. In Matter<br />

6 Matter of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, mo., and United Electrical and<br />

Radio Workers of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 71, order enforced in Consolidated Edison Co. V.<br />

National Labor Relations Board, 95 F. (2d) 390 (C. C. A. 2d, 1938), certiorari granted.<br />

304 U. S. 555. See also Matter of Fashion Piece Dye Works, Inc., and Federation of sirk,<br />

and Rayon Dyers and Finishers of America, 6 N. L. R. B. 274, order enforced in National<br />

Labor Relations Board V. Fashion Piece Dye Works, Inc., 3 Cir., decided November 28, 1938,<br />

where the president of the company told an employee that he had a Pinkerton detective<br />

trailing him the previous night when the employee had met with officers of the union.<br />

'Matter of Agtoilines, Inc., and International Longshoremen's Association, 2 N. L. R. B. 1,<br />

order enforced in Agwilines, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board, 87 F. (2d) 146<br />

(C. C. A. 5th, 1937).<br />

° See also Matter of William Randolph Hearst, Hearst Publications, Inc., and American<br />

Newspaper Guild, Seattle Chapter, 2 N. L. R. B. 530, where the employer's city editor<br />

told a union member that the employer had "an espionage system that reaches everywhere,"<br />

and averred that the publishers knew of every member of the Guild in Seattle.<br />

9 See for example, Matter of Metropolitan Engineering and Metropolitan Device Corporation<br />

and United Electrical and Radio Workers of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 542; Matter of<br />

Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Company Inc., and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of<br />

America, 1 N. L. R. B. 411, order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-<br />

Harry Marks Clothing CO., 301 U. S. 58, enforcement denied in 85 F. (2d) 1 (C. C. A. 2d,<br />

1936 .<br />

See, for example, Matter of Mansfield Mills, Inc., and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />

3 N. L. R. B. 901; Matter of C. A. Lund Company and Northland Ski Manufacturing<br />

Company, and Woodenware Workers Union, Local 20481, 6 N. L. R. B. 423. In some cases<br />

supervisory officials drove past the union meeting place in an automobile; in others they<br />

stood outside watching the employees enter and leave. A somewhat similar practice was<br />

revealed in Matter of Tiny Town Togs, mo., and International Ladies' Garment Workers<br />

Union, 7 N. L. R. B. 54, where supervisory officials of the company stationed themselves<br />

outside the plant to observe which employees accepted the union pamphlets then being<br />

passed out by organizers.<br />

11 Matter of Boas Manufacturing Company and International Glove Workers of America,<br />

3 N. L. It. B. 400.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!