NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 53<br />
him constantly and make reports to the company concerning his<br />
union activities; other detectives were sent to attend union meetings<br />
and conventions; still others were given union leaflets and circulars<br />
for investigational purposes.°<br />
Espionage, is not, however, limited to the activities of professional<br />
spies employed for such purposes. At times regular employees have<br />
been directed or encouragtd by the employer to report upon the union<br />
membership or activities of their fellow workers. Such action by the<br />
employer also is violative of section 8 (1). In some cases the evidence<br />
establishes quite a comprehensive and efficient system maintained<br />
by the employer for keeping himself informed of the progress<br />
of the union and of its officers. Thus in Matter of Agwilines, Iiw.,7<br />
detailed reports on union activities in the various branch offices of<br />
the company were regularly made and transmitted to the general<br />
office which determined the company's labor policy.° In other cases,<br />
while no such system existed, individual employees were utilized on<br />
occasion for spying purposes.°<br />
Perhaps the most common type of espionage which appears in the<br />
cases is that engaged in by company supervisory or managerial employees,<br />
and officials. Such employees and officials have been found<br />
to post themselves at points of vantage near union meetings in order<br />
to note the identity of employees who attended. 1° In Matter of Boss<br />
Manufacturing Company a foreman repeatedly importuned an employee<br />
to give him information about the union's activities, but the<br />
employee refused. The Board found that the attempted procurement<br />
of such information, though unsuccessful, was a violation of section<br />
8 (1).<br />
2. BRIBERY<br />
Bribery or attempted bribery of employees, as an antiunion weapon,<br />
has been found in a number of cases. The Board has condemned<br />
such practice as a violation of section 8 (1). In some instances company<br />
officials have openly offered bribes to union leaders in an<br />
attempt to induce them to cease their union activities. In Matter<br />
6 Matter of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, mo., and United Electrical and<br />
Radio Workers of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 71, order enforced in Consolidated Edison Co. V.<br />
National Labor Relations Board, 95 F. (2d) 390 (C. C. A. 2d, 1938), certiorari granted.<br />
304 U. S. 555. See also Matter of Fashion Piece Dye Works, Inc., and Federation of sirk,<br />
and Rayon Dyers and Finishers of America, 6 N. L. R. B. 274, order enforced in National<br />
Labor Relations Board V. Fashion Piece Dye Works, Inc., 3 Cir., decided November 28, 1938,<br />
where the president of the company told an employee that he had a Pinkerton detective<br />
trailing him the previous night when the employee had met with officers of the union.<br />
'Matter of Agtoilines, Inc., and International Longshoremen's Association, 2 N. L. R. B. 1,<br />
order enforced in Agwilines, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board, 87 F. (2d) 146<br />
(C. C. A. 5th, 1937).<br />
° See also Matter of William Randolph Hearst, Hearst Publications, Inc., and American<br />
Newspaper Guild, Seattle Chapter, 2 N. L. R. B. 530, where the employer's city editor<br />
told a union member that the employer had "an espionage system that reaches everywhere,"<br />
and averred that the publishers knew of every member of the Guild in Seattle.<br />
9 See for example, Matter of Metropolitan Engineering and Metropolitan Device Corporation<br />
and United Electrical and Radio Workers of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 542; Matter of<br />
Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Company Inc., and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of<br />
America, 1 N. L. R. B. 411, order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-<br />
Harry Marks Clothing CO., 301 U. S. 58, enforcement denied in 85 F. (2d) 1 (C. C. A. 2d,<br />
1936 .<br />
See, for example, Matter of Mansfield Mills, Inc., and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />
3 N. L. R. B. 901; Matter of C. A. Lund Company and Northland Ski Manufacturing<br />
Company, and Woodenware Workers Union, Local 20481, 6 N. L. R. B. 423. In some cases<br />
supervisory officials drove past the union meeting place in an automobile; in others they<br />
stood outside watching the employees enter and leave. A somewhat similar practice was<br />
revealed in Matter of Tiny Town Togs, mo., and International Ladies' Garment Workers<br />
Union, 7 N. L. R. B. 54, where supervisory officials of the company stationed themselves<br />
outside the plant to observe which employees accepted the union pamphlets then being<br />
passed out by organizers.<br />
11 Matter of Boas Manufacturing Company and International Glove Workers of America,<br />
3 N. L. It. B. 400.