07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLTSHED 175<br />

interest in collective bargaining among such employees. 49 Also of<br />

importance is the fact that the labor policy affecting different groups<br />

of employees is centrally determined 5°<br />

Another factor which has been considered by the Board as indicating<br />

a community of interest is the fact that the employees whose inclusion<br />

in a single .unit is in issue utilize the same recreational, medical, or<br />

parking facilities.' The factor of a common community life was<br />

given weight in Matter of Tennessee Copper Company, 52 where the<br />

issue was whether or not the company's employees in three towns<br />

should be divided into three units. The Board, in holding that they<br />

should not, pointed out that :<br />

The three communities in the basin are likewise closely related. Copperhill, an<br />

incorporated town, has a population of 6,000, including those just outside the<br />

corporate limits. The other two settlements are unincorporated. Ducktown<br />

has 1,500 inhabitants and Isabella 600. The entire basin constitutes a single<br />

judicial district of Polk County; with a courthouse at Ducktoxvn. There is a<br />

community center at Ducktown, which is used by residents of both Ducktown<br />

and Isabella. A high school near Duektown serves both Ducktown and Isabella.<br />

All the land between the three communities is owned or leased by the Company.<br />

The Board has held that the mere fact that a proposed unit includes<br />

only a small number of employees does not render such a unit necessarily<br />

inappropriate. In Matter of The Warfield Company 53 it said :<br />

Employees having special skills have long been organized into unions upon the<br />

basis of those skills. Such unions are among the oldest and among those having<br />

the most continuous experience of collective bargaining with employers. Very<br />

often, too, because of the highly specialized character of the skill there are but<br />

a few of them in any one plant. The respondent does not consider it impractical<br />

to bargain with every single employee separately ; it is surely no more impractical<br />

to bargain collectively with a group of 13 as a unit • • *."<br />

(A) NATURE OF WORK<br />

Generally, it will be seen that men who do the same type of work<br />

will have the same problems with regard to hours, wages, and other<br />

conditions of employment. The reasons for enabling them to bargain<br />

collectively as a single unit are, therefore, obvious. 99 Conversely, the<br />

" Mat ter of Aluminum Company of America and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries, The<br />

Aluminum Cooking Utensil Company and The Aluminum Seal Company and International<br />

Union Aluminum Workers of America. 6 N. L. R. B. 444; and Matter of The American Brass<br />

Company and The Waterbury Brass Workers' Union, 6 N. L. R. B. 723.<br />

0 Matter of Tennessee Electric Power Company and International Brotherhood of Electrical<br />

Workers, 7 N. L. It. B. 24' and Matter of Fisher Body Corporation and United<br />

Automobile Workers of America, Local 76, 7 N. L. R. B. 1083. This factor was also<br />

given weight by the Board in several of the cases cited below in section G 3 (H), which<br />

deals with geographically separated groups of employees, and in section G 3 (I), which<br />

deals with the employees of separate companies.<br />

ea matter of The American Brass Company and The Waterbury Brass Workers' Union, 6<br />

N. L. R. B. 723; and Matter of Fisher Body Corporation and United Automobile Workers<br />

of America, Local 76, 7 N. L. It. B. 1083.<br />

Matter of Tennessee Copper Company and A. F. of L. Federal Union No. 21164, 5<br />

N. L R. B. 768. 4<br />

Matter of The Warfield Company, a corporation formerly known as The Thomson 4:4<br />

Taylor Company and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 399, et al.,<br />

6 N. L. R. B. 58.<br />

See also: Matter of Hopwood Retinning Company, Inc. and Monarch Retinning<br />

Company, Inc., and Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Helpers International Union<br />

Local No. 8, and Teamsters Union, Local No. 584, 4 N. L. R. B. 922.<br />

Els Matter of Huth cE James Shoe Mfg. Company and United Shoe Workers of America,<br />

3 N. L. R. B. 220; Matter of International Mercantile Marine Company and United States<br />

Lines Company and Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America,<br />

Local No. 22, 3 N. L. R. B. 751; Matters of Rossie Velvet Company and Charles B. Rayhatt<br />

and Textile Workers Organizing Committee, etc., 3 N. L. It. B. 804; Matter of Todd Shipyards<br />

Corporation et al. and Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of<br />

America, 5 N. L. Ft. B. 20; Matter of International Harvester Company Tractor Works and<br />

Farm Equipment Workers Association Division of A. A. I. S. d T. W. N. A. Lodge No. MO,<br />

C. I. 0., 5 N. L. Ft. B. 192; Matter of Standard Oil Convpany of California and Oil Workers<br />

International Union, Local 269, 5 N. L. R. B. 750; Matter of American Steel & Wire Corn-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!