07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IX. LITIGATION 241<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil d Gas Co. et at 98 F. (2d)<br />

405 (C. C. A. 5th), suit pending on June 30, 1938.<br />

2. Cases in which Board motions under section 10 (d) to withdraw proceedings<br />

and vacate orders for further proceedings before the Board were granted.<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. Timken, Silent Automatic Company,<br />

Remanded January 17, 1938 (C. C. A. 2) ;<br />

H. J. Heinz Company v. National Labor Relations Board (C. C. A. 3d)<br />

C. C. H. Labor Law Service, Par. 18237;<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. Protective Motor Service Company,<br />

Remanded June 27, 1938, (C. C. A. 3d)<br />

Washington Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board,<br />

97 Fed. (2d) 1010, (C. C. A. 6th) ;<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Motor Company and Ford<br />

Motor Company v. National Labor Relations Board (C. C. A. 6th),<br />

C. C. H. Labor Law Service, Par. 17005. Cert. granted October 10, 1938;<br />

In/and Steel Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 97 Fed. (2d)<br />

1006, (C. C. A. 7th) ;.<br />

Douglas Aircraft Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 96 F.<br />

(2d) 1016 (C. C. A. 9th).<br />

Empire Furniture Corporation v. Textile Workers Organizing Committee<br />

and National Labor Relations Board, 97 Fed. (2d) 1000 (C. C.<br />

A. 9th).<br />

North Whittier Heights Citrus Association v. National Labor Relations<br />

Board, 97 Fed. (2d) 1010 (C. C. A. 9th).<br />

3. Cases in which suits to review or stay Board action taken pursuant to section<br />

9 (c) were denied.<br />

United Employees Association v. National Labor Relations Board, 96<br />

F. (2d) 875 (C. C. A. 3d) ;<br />

Unlicensed Employees Collective Bargaining Agency of the Marine<br />

Aepartment of Sabine Transportation, Company, Dover, Delaware.<br />

Inc., at • al., v. National Labor Relations Board (C. C. A. 5th),<br />

decided November 12, 1937;<br />

Combustion Engineering Company v. National Labor Relations Board,<br />

95 F. (2d) 996 (C. C. A. 6th)<br />

New York Handkerchief Manufacturing Company v. National Labor<br />

Relations Board, 97 F. (2d) 1010 (C. C. A. 7th) ;<br />

Commercial Telegraphers Union V. J. Warren Madden et al. (C. A.,<br />

D. C.), decided November 18, 1937. Stay also denied by Supreme<br />

Court, C. C. H. Labor Law Service, Par. 14108.<br />

4. Cases in which suits to stay the orders of the Board pending review under<br />

Section 10 were denied.<br />

Consolidated Edison Co. et at v. National Labor Relations Board<br />

(C. C. A. 2d) ;<br />

Regal Shirt Company v. National Labor Relations Board (C. C. A. 3d) ;<br />

White Rock Quarries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (C. C. A.<br />

3d) ;<br />

MeNeeley & Price Company v. National Labor Relations Board<br />

(C. C. A. 3d) ;<br />

National Electrical Products Corporation et al v. National Labor<br />

Relations Board (C. C. A. 3d) •<br />

Swift & Company v. National Labor Relations Board (C. C. A. 10th).<br />

5. Cases in which petitions of Board for order directing respondents to post<br />

security for a further hearing before the Board were granted.<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. Stylecraft Leather Goods Company,<br />

Inc., petition granted June 22, 1938 (C. C. A. 3d).<br />

DISTRICT COURT CASES<br />

1. Cases in which Board suits, pursuant to section 11 (2), for the enforcement<br />

of subpoenas were granted.<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. Dominick Calderazzo at al, C. C. H.<br />

Labor Law Service, Par. 18109 (N. D. N. Y., February 14, 1938) ;<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. United Shipyards, Inc. (S. D. N. Y.<br />

June 1, 1938).<br />

9 . Cases in which Board petitions for leave to issue a complaint against a<br />

company operating under supervision of the court pursuant to section<br />

77 (b) of the Bankruptcy Law were denied.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!