NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 159<br />
In Matter of Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Com,pany 82 doubt<br />
arose after the issuance of the original Decision and Direction of Elections<br />
as to the propriety of including certain employees in the plant<br />
unit. The election showed that the votes of these employees could<br />
not affect the majority secured by one of the unions involved. The<br />
Board stated :<br />
In order to facilitate collective bargaining and to extend to the employees<br />
as quickly as possible the benefits of the collective bargaining that has already<br />
taken place, the Board will issue a certification applicable to the employees<br />
other than those in these five categories. When the Board has made a final<br />
determination as to the status of assistant foremen, inspectors, graduate students,<br />
indentured apprentices and cooperative students, it will, if it finds that<br />
any of these groups are to be included within the appropriate unit, issue<br />
another certification embodying that finding.'3<br />
The fact that all of the parties to a proceeding are agreed as to<br />
the extent of the unit has usually been treated by the Board as decisive.<br />
This agreement may appear in a stipulation entered into<br />
between the parties,84 or in the testimony or statements of representatives<br />
of the parties at the hearing before a trial examiner. 85 In<br />
cases involving an alleged violation of section 8 (5) of the act by<br />
refusal to bargain collectively, the agreement of the respondent<br />
may appear from its failure to question the appropriate unit alleged<br />
in the Board's complaint s° However, the mere absence of contention<br />
does not require the Board to accept the unit assumed by the<br />
parties to be appropriate. It may of its own motion exclude from<br />
the unit employees which it believes should not be included.87<br />
In a limited number of situations, the Board has found that it can<br />
formulate rules which apply in the absence of factors tending to make<br />
them inapplicable. An example of this manner of treatment may be<br />
seen in Matter of Tennessee Copper Company. 88 There the chief<br />
point at issue with regard to the appropriate unit was whether or not<br />
the company's employees should be divided into three units on a<br />
" Matter of Anis-Chaimers Manufacturing Company and International Union, United<br />
Automobile 'Yorkers of America, Local 248, 4 N. L. R. B. 159.<br />
83 Supplemental Decision and Certification of Representatives, 5 N. L. R. B. 158.<br />
" Matter of Goldstein Hat Manufacturing Company and United Hatters, Cap and MiUinery<br />
Workers International Union, Local 57, 4 N. L. R. B. 125 (employees listed) ; Matter<br />
of Southgate-Nelson Corporation and American Radio Telegraphists' Association, 4 N. L.<br />
R. B. 307; Matter of John Morrell cf Co. and United Packing House Workers, Local Industrial<br />
Union No. 32, 4 N. L. R. B. 436 (employees listed) ; Matter of Loose-Wiles Biscuit<br />
Co., Inc. and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers, 5 N. L. R. B. 59; Matter of<br />
International Harvester Company and Die Sinkers Local No. 527, Affiliated With the American<br />
Federation of Labor, 6 N. L. R. B. 545; Matter of Horton Manufacturing Company<br />
and United Electrical tE Radio Workers of America, Local 9,94, 7 N. L. R. B. 5; and<br />
Matter of Richardson Company and Employees Union, 7 N. L. R. B. 1113. In the<br />
latter case the Board stated that since the stipulated unit was "the same unit which was<br />
found to be appropriate by us in the previous case involving the company, we see no<br />
reason for changing the unit • • •." In this and the following two footnotes we<br />
mention only a few illustrative cases.<br />
" Matter of Eagle-Phenix Mills and Textile Workers Organizing Committee, 4 N. L. R.<br />
B. 966; Matter of Ingram Manufacturing Company and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />
5 N. L. R. B. 908; and Matter of Brown-Saltman Furniture Company and United<br />
Furniture Workers of America, Local No. 576, C. I. O., 7 N. L. R. B. 1174.<br />
8, Matter of Omaha Hat Corporation and United Hatters, Cap and Millinery Workers<br />
International Union, Local Nos. 7 and 8, 4 N. L. R. B. 878; and Matter of Kuehne Manufacturing<br />
Company and Local No. 2791, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of<br />
America, 7 N. L. R. B. 304.<br />
al Matter of American France Line et al. and International Seamen's Union of America,<br />
3 N. L. It. B. 64; and Matter of Star if Crescent Oil Co., a California corporation, doing<br />
business as San Diego Marine Construction Company, and International Association of<br />
Machinists, Local No. 389; Shipwrights, Boatbuilders and Caulkers ; and International<br />
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 569, 3 N. L. It. B. 882.<br />
ss Matter of Tennessee Copper Company and A. F. of L. Federal Union No. 2114<br />
5 N. L. R. B. 768.