07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 73<br />

against whonl the alleged discrimination has been directed, for the provision<br />

thereof has express application to a discrimination as to hire."<br />

In Matter of Montgomery Ward and COmpany, 2° the Board said:<br />

We have found that Charles E. Hooper was refused employment by the respondent<br />

because of his union membership and that such refusal constituted<br />

an unfair labor practice within the meaning of the Act. Such refusal had the<br />

effect and will necessarily have the effect of discouraging membership in the<br />

Union and thereby infringing upon the rights of its employees to self-organization<br />

and collective bargaining.<br />

In other words, protection of prospective employees is necessary<br />

for the protection of present employees. As the Board has pointed<br />

out, anti-union discrimination against an applicant for employment<br />

is as effective a means for communicating to employees the employer's<br />

campaign against the union, as discrimination against a<br />

present employee.21<br />

The Board has had occasion to condemn several types of discrimination<br />

other than interruption of, or refusal to give, tenure. 22 In<br />

Matter of Clover Fork Coal Company,23 the employer assigned union<br />

men to a very difficult section of the mine as a punishment or as a<br />

means of forcing them to quit. One employee so assigned would have<br />

had to move from 20 to 25 cars of rock and dirt and in so doing<br />

would have been required to work for nothing for about a week.<br />

Another employee's assignment would have taken a month's or more<br />

work, without compensation. In other cases the discrimination consisted<br />

in withholding a wage increase, 24 demotion, 25 refusal to reinstate<br />

to the position formerly held in one plant coupled with offer<br />

of a position in another plant. 2° The Board has refrained from<br />

finding a section 8 (3) violation where the disparate treatment is<br />

trifling. In Matter of The A. S. Abell Co., 27 the employer accelerated<br />

the speed of the machine operated by the employee in question beyond<br />

the speed required for business reasons and beyond the speed of the<br />

machine operated by a fellow workers The Board dismissed the<br />

complaint, stating:<br />

While we believe Thamert's membership in the Union may have been responsible<br />

for the treatment of which he complained, we consider that treat-<br />

.0 Matter of The Kelly-Springfield Company and United Rubber Workers of America,<br />

etc., 6 N. L. R. B. 325, enforced in Kelly-Springfield Tire Company v. National Labor<br />

Relations Board, 97 F. (2d) 1007 (C. C. A. 4th, 1938).<br />

.0 Matter of Montgomery Ward and Company, etc., and United Mail Order and Retail<br />

Workers of America, 4 N. L. R. B. 1151.<br />

21 Matter of Algonquin Printing Company and United Textile Workers of America, etc.,<br />

1 N. L. R. B. 264.<br />

See Matter of Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation and Amalgamated Association of<br />

Iron, Steel, and Tin Workers of North America, etc., 5 N. L. R. B. 930, enforcement denied<br />

In Fawned Metallurgical Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 98 F. (2d) 375<br />

(C. C. A. 7th, 1938), certiorari granted November 19, 1938; Matter of Ingram Manufacturing<br />

Company and Textile Workers Organizing Committee, 5 N. L. R. B. 908; Matter of<br />

Star Publishing Company and Seattle Newspaper Guild, etc., 4 N. L. R. B. 498, enforced in<br />

National Labor Relations Board v. Star Publishing Company, 97 F. (2d) 465 (C. C. A. 9th,<br />

1938) ; Matter of American Potash if Chemical Corporation and Borax and Potash Workers<br />

Union, etc., 3 N. L. R. B. 140, enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. American<br />

Potash and Chemical Corporation, 98 F. (2d) 488 (C. C. A. 9th, 1938).<br />

23 Matter of Clover Fork Coal Company and District 19, United Mine Workers of America,<br />

4 N. L. R. B. 202, enforced in Clover Fork Coal Company v. National Labor Relations<br />

Board, 97 F. (2d) 331 (C. C. A. 6th, 1938).<br />

Matter of Federal Carton Corporation and Local Printing Pressmen's Union, etc.,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 879. (The Board found a sec. 8 (3) violation, though the employer had<br />

remedied the detriment before issuance of the order.)<br />

Matter of Waggoner Refining Company, etc., and International Association of Oil<br />

Field, Gas Well, and Refinery Workers of America, 6 N. L. R. B. 731.<br />

Matter of Aluminum Products Company, etc., and Aluminum Workers Union, etc.,<br />

7 N. L. R. B. 1219.<br />

21 Matter of The A. S. Abell Company and International Printing and Pressmen's<br />

Union, etc., 5 N. L. R. B. 644, enforced in part in National Labor Relations Board v.<br />

A S. Abell Company, 97 F. (2d) 051 (C. C. A. 4th, 1938).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!