07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 137<br />

Where by the terms of an agreement recognition is granted to the<br />

contracting labor organization as the representative of its members<br />

only, such a contract has no effect upon the determination of the<br />

question concerning representation. This principle was announced in<br />

Matter of Northrop Corporation, 53 in the following words:<br />

= * * the Company took the position that the agreement was a binding one,<br />

and that it prevented the Union from making any claim other than that of<br />

representing its own members * * * As we have decided before, the Act and<br />

not the particular agreement furnishes the rule that must guide the Board in<br />

its determination. The agreement in this case cannot foreclose the claim of<br />

the Union to be certified as the exclusive representative, which right must be<br />

decided solely by reference to section 9 (a) of the Act. Nor can the Union<br />

be said to be estopped by reason of any such agreement. The agreement therefore<br />

has no effect upon the determination of the issues in this proceeding."<br />

In Matter of Red River Lumber Company, 55 the existing contract<br />

provided that it was to be automatically terminated if and when the<br />

Board found the contracting union not to be the designated exclusive<br />

bargaining agency. Since the contract contemplated action by the<br />

Board, it obviously did not foreclose the question concerning representation.<br />

In Matter of Zellerbach, Paper Company," the employer<br />

signed a contract by the terms of which it agreed to negotiate with<br />

the union, provided a majority of its employees were members of the<br />

contracting union. In Matter of Consolidated Aircraft Corporation,<br />

the contract, by its own terms, was terminable if a majority of the<br />

employees in the unit should elect other representation. In view of<br />

the express terms of these contracts, it was clear that the contracts<br />

were no bars to elections, and the Board found accordingly.<br />

International Mercantile Marine et at. and National Maritime Union of America, 2 N. L.<br />

R. B. 971, precludes any assertion of rights under contracts which it has made with any<br />

of these companies." See also Matter of Cote Bros. Inc. and International Brotherhood of<br />

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen and Helpers of America, Bakery Drivers Local No. 686,<br />

7 N. L. R. B. 70.<br />

" Matter of Northrop Corporation and United Automobile Workers, Local No. 229, 3<br />

N. L. It. B. 228.<br />

" The principle has been followed in these cases: Matter of City Auto Stamping Company<br />

and International Union, United Automobile Workera of America, Local No. 12, 3 N. L. R. B.<br />

306; Matter of Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines et al. (Southeastern Greyhound Lines) and<br />

The Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 3 N. L. R. B. 622, 640; Matter of General Mills,<br />

Inc.. doing buainesa under the trade name of Washburn Crosby Company and Flour, Feed,<br />

and Cereal Workers Federal Union No. 19184, and United Grain and Cereal Workers, Local<br />

No. 240, 3 N. L. R. B. 730; Matter of McKesson & Robbins, Inc., Blumauer Frank Drug Division<br />

and International Longshoremen d Warehouiremens Union, Local 9, District 1, affiliated<br />

with the C. I. 0., 5 N. L. R. B. 70; Matter of Horton Manufacturing Company and United<br />

Electrical & Radio Workers of America, Local 904, 6 N. L. R. B. 2 and 7 N. L. R. B. 557:<br />

Matter of Diamond Iron Works and United Electrical Radio Machine Workers of America,<br />

Local 1140, 6 N. L. R. B. 94; Hatter of Unit Cast Corporation and Steel Workers Organizing<br />

Committee, 7 N. L. R. B. 129; Matter of Santa Fe Trails Transportation Company and<br />

International Association of Machinists, Local Lodge isos, 7 N. L. R. B. 358; Matter<br />

of Fisher Body Corporation and United Automobile Workers of America, Local 76, 7 N. L.<br />

R. B. 1083; Matter of Pressed Steel Car Company, Inc. and Steel Workers Organizing<br />

Committee, 7 N. L. R. B. 1099. Since an agreement which grants recognition to the<br />

contracting union for its members only does not preclude the certification of representatives,<br />

it is clear that there is no merit in the contention that the individual contracts under<br />

which a majority of screen writers are employed bar the certification of representatives,<br />

Matter of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, and Motion Picture Producers Assn., et al., and<br />

Screen Writers' Guild, Inc., 7 N. L. R. B. 662. Equally clear is the fact that the posting<br />

of a notice or statement of policy promulgated as a unilateral act on the part of the<br />

employer and without the assent of the union does not bar a certification by the Board,<br />

Matter of Daily Mirror, Inc. and The Newspaper Guild of New York, 5 N. L. R. B. 362;<br />

Matter of Lunkenheimer Company and Steel Workers Organizing Committee, 4 N. L. R. B.<br />

1131.<br />

55 Matter of Red River Lumber Company and Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union Local<br />

No. 53 of International Woodworkers of America, 5 N. L. R. B. 663.<br />

" Matter of Zellerbach Paper Company and International Longshoremen and Warehousemen's<br />

Union, Local 1-96, 4 N. L. R. B. 348.<br />

47 Matter of Consolidated Aircraft Corporation and International Union, United Automobile<br />

Workers of America, Local 2vo. 506, C. I. 0., 7 N. L. R. B. 1061.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!