07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF <strong>NATIONAL</strong> <strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>RELATIONS</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />

100% to the laws of this count6. If by any chance 51% of our employees<br />

should join the Union, and their outside representative would call on us, an<br />

officer or representative of this company would naturally, under the law, bargain<br />

with him or them. I doubt however that my people would choose to have<br />

an outsider represent them.<br />

That same night the president addressed the knitters in the plant<br />

at midnight and, referring to the organizational efforts, said "I<br />

cleaned them out two years ago and I am going to clean them out<br />

again if I have to fire every damn man I have got * * * This<br />

is my plant, and I will run it the way I please." Earlier that same<br />

day an employee was discharged for union membership. The Board<br />

stated :<br />

Nebel's Christmas speech, as related in the testimony of the two employees,<br />

foreshadowed the hostility which the Union was to encounter. * * * We are<br />

convinced that the midnight session with the knitters was a step deliberately<br />

taken for the purpose of interfering with, restraining, and coercing these employees<br />

in rights which were secured them under the act. Nebel's attempt<br />

to portray this incident as a casual conversation between himself and the<br />

employees, to discuss provisions of the Act, is not borne out by the evidence.<br />

The hour of the conversation, his own presence, the discharge of Griffin earlier<br />

in the day, his knowledge that the Union organizers had been distributing<br />

circulars outside the mill, render such interpretation highly implausible. * * *<br />

We also view the use to which the respondent put the sheet "Facts about the<br />

Wagner Law" as interference and coercion of the same stamp. This unfair<br />

labor practice was rooted not so much in the distribution or contents, per .se,<br />

of the reprint, but in the statements of Nebel which accompanied distribution.<br />

The emphasis placed, in his letter to the employees, upon the words of the<br />

reprint that an employer had the right to select and discharge employees,<br />

followed, as it was, by Nebel's own words that "Personally, I don't deny the<br />

fact that I am against labor Unions," was well calculated to intimidate The<br />

concluding appeal of the letter, "I doubt however that my people would choose<br />

to have an outsider represent them," under the facts involved, was coercive<br />

* * *.<br />

7. MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 8 (1)<br />

The more common forms of employer action violative of the section<br />

have been dealt with above. The cases, however, contain considerable<br />

antiunion conduct which, while not as recurrent, nevertheless has<br />

been the subject of consideration by the Board. Thus section (1)<br />

WaS held violated by the employers' attempt to place limitations upon<br />

what representatives the employees should designate as their collective<br />

bargaining representative ; 52 and a similar attempt, although<br />

unsuccessful, to dictate to them the form of their labor organization,<br />

such as an "inside" union.53<br />

A discharge of workers for engaging in concerted activities unrelated<br />

to union organization may constitute an unfair labor practice<br />

under the section. In Matter of Indianapolis Glove Company, 54 employees<br />

were dismissed for engaging in a brief stoppage of work<br />

induced by a wage grievance. The Board's opinion pointed out :<br />

iv See Matter of Oregon Worsted Company and United Textile Workers of America,<br />

Local 205, 1 N. L. R. B. 916, order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon<br />

Worsted Company, 96 F. (2d) 193 (C. C. A. 9th, 1938) ; Matter of Wallace Manufacturing<br />

Company, Inc., and Local No. 2237, United Textile Workers of America, 2 N. L. It. B. 1081,<br />

order enforced in National Labor Relations Hoard v. Wallace Mfg. Co., Inc., 95 F. (2d)<br />

818 (C. C. A. 4th, 1938).<br />

s' See Matter of Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation and Amalgamated Association of<br />

Iron, Steel and Tin Workers of North America, Local 66, 5 N. L. R. B., enforcement denied<br />

on other grounds in Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board.<br />

98 F. (2d) 375 (C. C. A. 7th, 1938), certiorari granted November 19, 1938; Matter of<br />

United Carbon Company, inc., and Oil Workers International Union, Local 2,56 ., 7 N. L. R. B.<br />

598.<br />

54 Matter' of Indianapolis Glove Company and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 231.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!