NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
146 THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF <strong>NATIONAL</strong> <strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>RELATIONS</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />
(E) CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION<br />
The direction of elections issued by the Board leave the details<br />
of the election procedure to be determined by the person who is<br />
named as the Board's representative to conduct the election. 12 Ordinarily<br />
each voter must personally cast his ballot in the presence of,<br />
and at a place designated by, the representative of the Board. In<br />
some instances, however, the Board has permitted voting by mail.<br />
Thus, in Matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company 18 and in Matter<br />
of Pacific Greyhound Lines," the Board said :<br />
We expressly authorize the use of the United States mail for such purposes<br />
and the use of agents, if feasible, to journey through the Company's various<br />
territorial divisions to conduct elections at appropriate places, collecting the<br />
votes in sealed envelopes for delivery to the Regional Director.<br />
In Matter of United Press Associations,' 5 the terms and conditions<br />
of the election were agreed upon in stipulations entered into by the<br />
parties, and the secret ballot was conducted through the mails and<br />
by cablegrams To be acceptable, all returned ballots had to show a<br />
postmark of not later than midnight of a given date.16<br />
In Matter of Charles Cushman Shoe Company,' 7 the Board's direction<br />
provided f9r elections to be conducted among those persons in<br />
the appropriate unit employed as of March 24, 1937. In regard to<br />
an objection to the elections which had been conducted the Board<br />
said :<br />
Persons were permitted to vote in an election by signing affidavits to the<br />
effect that they were employed by the particular company involved in such<br />
election on March 24, 1937. The objection is made that voting lists against<br />
which to check the voters should have been provided by the Board and that the<br />
carrying out of the elections by means of affidavits violated the Direction for<br />
Elections issued by the Board and was injurious to the parties involved. The<br />
Direction for Elections authorized the Regional Director to conduct elections by<br />
secret ballot in accordance with Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relaballots<br />
cast they should be disregarded in tabulating the effective vote. Under such an<br />
arrangement these ballots would merely have filled the role of indicating to the Board that<br />
less than a majority of those voting do not desire to be represented by either labor organization.<br />
The wishes of this minority should then properly be held ineffective to prevent a<br />
choice of representative by the majority of the employees who desire representation by one<br />
of the contending agencies.<br />
"If a majority of those casting ballots should mark their ballots in the 'or by neither'<br />
space, no representatives should be certified. Otherwise, the choice of a majority of<br />
employees voting in favor of representation by one of the rival organizations should be<br />
declared to be the representative of all.<br />
'The purpose of an election under the Act is to allay an existing controversy over representation.<br />
The heart of that controversy in the case before us is the wishes of the active<br />
partisans for either of the candidates. It has already happened in the Board's experience<br />
with the use of the 'or by neither' place on the ballot that a minority of a very few ballots<br />
so marked can destroy the bargaining choice of a large majority of the employees who<br />
have voted for either one or the other contending labor organization. To permit the continuance<br />
of a device which can produce such illogical results seems to me entirely gratuitous,<br />
particularly when it does not appear to be required either by the purposes or the wording<br />
of the Act."<br />
12 See Matter of Woodside Cotton Mills Company and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />
7 N. L. R. B. 960, in which the Board stated : "The parties also agreed that the<br />
election should be held on a day when the mill is in operation (at the present time, the<br />
mill operates only on Monday and Tuesday and is closed the balance Of the week), at the<br />
Woodside Grade School, which is in the vicinity of the mill, and that voting should take<br />
place from 11 a. m. to 8 p. m. This is a matter within the discretion of the Regional<br />
Director in his conduct of the election, but we see no objection to the holding of the election<br />
at the time and place agreed upon by the parties."<br />
2-3 Matter of Pact/to Gas and Electric) Company and United Electrical .1 Radio Workers<br />
of America, 3 N. L. R. B. 835.<br />
14 Matter of Pacific Greyhound Lines and Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen,<br />
4 N. L. R. B. 520.<br />
16 Matter of United Press Associations and American Newspaper Guild, 3 N. L. R. B. 344.<br />
16 The Board has also been faced with serious difficulties in conducting elections involving<br />
maritime workers. For a discussion of the practices followed in these cases, see Second<br />
Annual Report, pp. 111-113.<br />
"Matter of Charles Cushman Shoe Company, et al. and United Shoe Workers of America,<br />
2 N. L. It. B. 1015.