07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF <strong>NATIONAL</strong> <strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>RELATIONS</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />

as to the appropriate unit or units. It is considered that by according<br />

either union a majority, the employees indicate their preference for<br />

the form of organization adopted by that union. It is on the basis<br />

of the election thus directed that the Board makes its finding, as may<br />

be seen in the language of the Globe case quoted at the beginning of<br />

this section. In this connection Matter of Pacific Gas and Electric<br />

Company 39 is of particular interest. In that case, three rival unions<br />

contended that bus and street railway employees should be included<br />

in one unit without outside or physical workers, while a fourth favored<br />

a separate unit for the former. The Board directed the holding of a<br />

separate election for these employees, with the names of all four unions<br />

on the ballot, and stated :<br />

On the result of these elections will depend the appropriate unit for the purposes<br />

of collective bargaining. If a majority of the employees in the railway<br />

group and in the outside or physical group elect to be represented by the same<br />

union, both groups together will constitute a single unit. If a majority of the<br />

employees in the railway group elects to be represented by the Amalgamated,<br />

then the railway group will constitute a single separate unit. If a majority<br />

of the employees in the railway group elects to be represented by any one of<br />

the three unions other than the Amalgamated, it will become part of a single<br />

unit with the outside or physical group, such a choice by them placing the employees<br />

of the railway group in the larger unit. The question would remain,<br />

however, as to which union represents the larger unit. If the union elected<br />

by the railway group is different from the union elected by a majority of the<br />

employees in the outside or physical group, it will be necessary to determine<br />

•whether either of the two unions has received a majority of the votes cast by<br />

both the railway workers and the physical or outside workers, treating both<br />

groups as a single unit. If neither has received a majority, it will then be<br />

necessary to conduct another election among the railway workers and the<br />

outside or physical workers, as a single unit, to determine which of the unions,<br />

which in these proceedings contend for the larger unit, shall represent the employees<br />

in the unit. If none of the unions receives a majority of the votes cast<br />

by the employees of the railway group in the election directed in the instant<br />

Direction of Elections, but the number of votes cast for the unions claiming the<br />

larger appropriate unit constitutes a majority, the railway group will be treated<br />

as a part of a single unit together with the outside or physical group.<br />

It should also be noted that the holding of separate elections in the<br />

manner above discussed does not necessarily result in a final determination<br />

of the appropriate unit. In Matter of Pacific Greyhound<br />

Line8,40 a petition was filed by a union which alleged that a question<br />

concerning representation had arisen among the bus drivers employed<br />

by the company. Another union claimed that the bus drivers were<br />

part of a larger unit. The Board considered that either contention<br />

could be sustained and stated :<br />

* • • we shall direct an election to be held among the bus drivers employed<br />

by the Company to determine whether they wish to be represented by the<br />

Brotherhood, the Amalgamated, or neither. Upon the results of this election will<br />

depend in part the determination of the unit appropriate for the purposes of<br />

collective bargaining. If the bus drivers choose the Brotherhood, bus drivers<br />

alone will constitute an appropriate unit ; if they choose the Amalgamated, they<br />

will have expressed their preference for a single larger unit consisting of all<br />

the employees. In the absence, however, of any evidence which would warrant<br />

our finding that a question concerning representation has arisen among the<br />

employees other than bus drivers, and in the absence of a petition requesting a<br />

certification of representatives of all the employees in the larger unit, it will not<br />

be necessary at this time to determine the appropriateness of such unit or whether<br />

the Amalgamated has been designated by a majority of the employees in that unit.<br />

le Matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company and United Electrical .4 Radio Workers<br />

of America, 3 N. L. R. B. 835.<br />

40 Matter of Pacific Greyhound Lines and Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and<br />

Ent:linemen, 4 N. L. R. B. 520.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!