NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WI. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISRED 131<br />
A question concerning representation has also been found where<br />
the Board had previously ordered the employers to cease and desist<br />
from bargaining collectively with any labor organization unless and<br />
until such labor organization had been selected in an election conducted<br />
by the Board as the bargaining agent of the employers and<br />
where no such election had been conducted. Matter of Canadian<br />
Fur Trappers Corporation.23<br />
In Matter of Alaska Packers Association,24 the Board found a<br />
question concerning representation to exist where the companies<br />
contended that they had no employees of the type covered by the<br />
petitions. The companies stated in support of their contention that<br />
they were engaged in seasonal operations, that employment terminated<br />
at the end of each season, and that they had ceased operations<br />
prior to the filing of the petitions and had not resumed operations<br />
at the time of the hearing. The Board stated :<br />
The evidence is clear, however, that an employer-employee relationship eTists<br />
between these cannery workers as a group and the Companies. The record<br />
shows that the great majority of these workers return season after season to<br />
work for one or another of these Companies. The fact that, as individuals,<br />
they may not work for the same Company season after season, does not in any<br />
way deprive them of the relationship which ttiey have with all three Companies<br />
as a group. In this respect, their status is comparable to that of longshoremen<br />
whose employment shifts from day to day among a small group of employers.<br />
We have consistently held that longshoremen are employees within the meaning<br />
of the Act and it follows that these cannery workers are none the less employees<br />
entitled to all the benefits accorded employees under the Act. Nor can<br />
it be argued that because these cannery workers engage in other occupations in<br />
off-season periods, their relationship with the Companies is altered. The record<br />
indicates that they constitute a clearly defined group of men to whom the<br />
Companies turn year after year for their requirements.<br />
In view of the foregoing facts it clearly appears that each person who was<br />
employed in 1937 by any of the three Companies has an interest with respect<br />
to employment in all the Companies for the 1938 season. It would be obviously<br />
Improper, however, to permit any particular worker to assert such interest in<br />
more than one of the Companies. Consequently we shall associate the employee<br />
status of the individual at the present time with that company which employed<br />
him in 1937. We shall, therefore, in determining the representatives herein,<br />
consider the desires of the cannery workers in connection with the individual<br />
companies which employed them during the 1937 season.<br />
The Board also found a question concerning representation to exist<br />
in Matter of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer 8tudios, 23 where the companies<br />
contended that screen writers, who were the only employees covered<br />
by the petitions, were not employees within the meaning of the act.<br />
In support of this contention it was urged that the services performed<br />
by screen writers are creative and professional in character,<br />
whereas the act applies to more standardized and mechanical employments;<br />
that screen writers receive high salaries, whereas the<br />
act is intended for the protection of wage earners in the lower income<br />
brackets; and that screen writers perform their services free<br />
from the control of the companies and must, therefore, be considered<br />
as independent contractors rather than employees. After<br />
22 Matter of Canadian Fur Trappers Corporation, Canadian Fur Trappers of New Jersey,<br />
Inc., Jordan's Inc., Morris Dornfeld, doing business as Werth's Wearing Apparel, and Department<br />
and Variety Stores Employees Union, Local II5—A, 4 N. L. R. B. 904.<br />
24 Matter of Alaska Packers Association and Alaska Cannery Workers Un,ion, Local No.<br />
5, Committee ior IndustrWl Organization, 7 N. L. R. B. 141.<br />
Matter of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios and Motion Picture Producers Assn., et al.,<br />
and Screen Titers' Guild, Inc., 7 N. L. R. B. 662.