07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WI. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISRED 131<br />

A question concerning representation has also been found where<br />

the Board had previously ordered the employers to cease and desist<br />

from bargaining collectively with any labor organization unless and<br />

until such labor organization had been selected in an election conducted<br />

by the Board as the bargaining agent of the employers and<br />

where no such election had been conducted. Matter of Canadian<br />

Fur Trappers Corporation.23<br />

In Matter of Alaska Packers Association,24 the Board found a<br />

question concerning representation to exist where the companies<br />

contended that they had no employees of the type covered by the<br />

petitions. The companies stated in support of their contention that<br />

they were engaged in seasonal operations, that employment terminated<br />

at the end of each season, and that they had ceased operations<br />

prior to the filing of the petitions and had not resumed operations<br />

at the time of the hearing. The Board stated :<br />

The evidence is clear, however, that an employer-employee relationship eTists<br />

between these cannery workers as a group and the Companies. The record<br />

shows that the great majority of these workers return season after season to<br />

work for one or another of these Companies. The fact that, as individuals,<br />

they may not work for the same Company season after season, does not in any<br />

way deprive them of the relationship which ttiey have with all three Companies<br />

as a group. In this respect, their status is comparable to that of longshoremen<br />

whose employment shifts from day to day among a small group of employers.<br />

We have consistently held that longshoremen are employees within the meaning<br />

of the Act and it follows that these cannery workers are none the less employees<br />

entitled to all the benefits accorded employees under the Act. Nor can<br />

it be argued that because these cannery workers engage in other occupations in<br />

off-season periods, their relationship with the Companies is altered. The record<br />

indicates that they constitute a clearly defined group of men to whom the<br />

Companies turn year after year for their requirements.<br />

In view of the foregoing facts it clearly appears that each person who was<br />

employed in 1937 by any of the three Companies has an interest with respect<br />

to employment in all the Companies for the 1938 season. It would be obviously<br />

Improper, however, to permit any particular worker to assert such interest in<br />

more than one of the Companies. Consequently we shall associate the employee<br />

status of the individual at the present time with that company which employed<br />

him in 1937. We shall, therefore, in determining the representatives herein,<br />

consider the desires of the cannery workers in connection with the individual<br />

companies which employed them during the 1937 season.<br />

The Board also found a question concerning representation to exist<br />

in Matter of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer 8tudios, 23 where the companies<br />

contended that screen writers, who were the only employees covered<br />

by the petitions, were not employees within the meaning of the act.<br />

In support of this contention it was urged that the services performed<br />

by screen writers are creative and professional in character,<br />

whereas the act applies to more standardized and mechanical employments;<br />

that screen writers receive high salaries, whereas the<br />

act is intended for the protection of wage earners in the lower income<br />

brackets; and that screen writers perform their services free<br />

from the control of the companies and must, therefore, be considered<br />

as independent contractors rather than employees. After<br />

22 Matter of Canadian Fur Trappers Corporation, Canadian Fur Trappers of New Jersey,<br />

Inc., Jordan's Inc., Morris Dornfeld, doing business as Werth's Wearing Apparel, and Department<br />

and Variety Stores Employees Union, Local II5—A, 4 N. L. R. B. 904.<br />

24 Matter of Alaska Packers Association and Alaska Cannery Workers Un,ion, Local No.<br />

5, Committee ior IndustrWl Organization, 7 N. L. R. B. 141.<br />

Matter of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios and Motion Picture Producers Assn., et al.,<br />

and Screen Titers' Guild, Inc., 7 N. L. R. B. 662.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!