07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF <strong>NATIONAL</strong> <strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>RELATIONS</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />

foremen and officials, a vote among the employees on the same<br />

subject. In reviewing the Board's order, the Circuit Court of Appeals<br />

said:<br />

* * * it is plain, we think, that after an exclusive bargaining unit has<br />

taken a strike vote, it is an active interference with the exercise of its right to<br />

"bargain collectively" for the employer to undercut its authority by a vote of his<br />

own. The only possible reason for doing this is to show that the union's vote<br />

does not truly represent the men's wishes ; it is to go over the heads of the<br />

representatives to their constituents ; to discredit them as representatives, to<br />

destroy their power to bargain as such.25<br />

However, employer-conducted elections are not confined to strike<br />

votes. In Matter of Eagle Manufacturing Campany, 26 after a variety<br />

of attempts to dissuade employees from joining the union, the<br />

company took a vote upon the question "company union, Committee<br />

for Industrial Organization union, or no union." The ballots were<br />

given out by the paymaster and collected by foremen. In Matter of<br />

McNeely & Price Compainy, 27 the general manager spoke against<br />

an outside union at a meeting of employees, suggested an "inside"<br />

union, and proposed that a vote be taken on the question. A secret<br />

ballot revealed the employees strongly in favor of an outside union.<br />

The company then brought about a second poll, its action this time<br />

supplemented by inducements to employees to vote in favor of an<br />

inside union. The opinion of the Board stated :<br />

After the employees had indicated their distinct preference for an "outside"<br />

union in the first plant election despite the respondent's interference, the respondent<br />

eliminated completely the employee's free choice in the selection of<br />

representatives by arranging for a second company-supervised election. To<br />

Insure the desired result, which was obtained in the second election, the<br />

respondent promised and subsequently awarded vacations with pay in return<br />

for the general repudiation of an "outside" union.<br />

We find that by the above acts the respondent, through its officers and agents,<br />

interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of the<br />

rights guaranteed in section 7 of the act.<br />

Campaigns and other action by employers to secure pledges of<br />

"loyalty" from employees generally have the same purpose of undermining<br />

union organization and activity that employer-supervised<br />

elections have. The Board has found such conduct a violation of the<br />

section. In Matter of Kiddie Kover Manufacturing Company,28 a<br />

petition reciting that the signatories did "not want the union," because<br />

the company "will give us a square deal" was circulated among<br />

the employees with the active assistance of a supervisory official. In<br />

Matter of American Manufacturing Comparty, 29 the petition, circulated<br />

at the company's suggestion, called for an expression of satisfaction<br />

"with present conditions," and a renunciation of any desire<br />

for "outside representation." 3° In Matter of Sanshine Mining Com-<br />

Order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand. Inc.<br />

'<br />

94 F. (2c1)<br />

862 (C. C. A. 2d, 1938) ; certiorari denied, 304 U. S. 576, rehearing denied, 304 U. S. 590.<br />

28 Matter of Eagle Manufacturing Company and Steel Workers Organizing Committee,<br />

6 N. L. R. B. 492, order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Eagle Manufacturing<br />

Company, 4 dr., decided November 10, 1938.<br />

21 Matter of McNeely d Price Company and National Leather Workers Association,<br />

6 N. L. R. B 800.<br />

28 Matter of Arthur L. Colten, and A. J. Colman, co-partners, doing business as Kiddie<br />

%over Manufacturing Company, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 6 N. L.<br />

R. B. 355.<br />

29 Matter of American Manufacturing Company and Textile Workers' Organizing Committee,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 443.<br />

See also Matter of Knoxville Glove Company and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 559, where the company's attorney prepared forms for withdrawal<br />

from the union, and the forms were distributed in the plant by supervisors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!