NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56 THIRD ANNUAL REPORT OF <strong>NATIONAL</strong> <strong>LABOR</strong> <strong>RELATIONS</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong><br />
foremen and officials, a vote among the employees on the same<br />
subject. In reviewing the Board's order, the Circuit Court of Appeals<br />
said:<br />
* * * it is plain, we think, that after an exclusive bargaining unit has<br />
taken a strike vote, it is an active interference with the exercise of its right to<br />
"bargain collectively" for the employer to undercut its authority by a vote of his<br />
own. The only possible reason for doing this is to show that the union's vote<br />
does not truly represent the men's wishes ; it is to go over the heads of the<br />
representatives to their constituents ; to discredit them as representatives, to<br />
destroy their power to bargain as such.25<br />
However, employer-conducted elections are not confined to strike<br />
votes. In Matter of Eagle Manufacturing Campany, 26 after a variety<br />
of attempts to dissuade employees from joining the union, the<br />
company took a vote upon the question "company union, Committee<br />
for Industrial Organization union, or no union." The ballots were<br />
given out by the paymaster and collected by foremen. In Matter of<br />
McNeely & Price Compainy, 27 the general manager spoke against<br />
an outside union at a meeting of employees, suggested an "inside"<br />
union, and proposed that a vote be taken on the question. A secret<br />
ballot revealed the employees strongly in favor of an outside union.<br />
The company then brought about a second poll, its action this time<br />
supplemented by inducements to employees to vote in favor of an<br />
inside union. The opinion of the Board stated :<br />
After the employees had indicated their distinct preference for an "outside"<br />
union in the first plant election despite the respondent's interference, the respondent<br />
eliminated completely the employee's free choice in the selection of<br />
representatives by arranging for a second company-supervised election. To<br />
Insure the desired result, which was obtained in the second election, the<br />
respondent promised and subsequently awarded vacations with pay in return<br />
for the general repudiation of an "outside" union.<br />
We find that by the above acts the respondent, through its officers and agents,<br />
interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of the<br />
rights guaranteed in section 7 of the act.<br />
Campaigns and other action by employers to secure pledges of<br />
"loyalty" from employees generally have the same purpose of undermining<br />
union organization and activity that employer-supervised<br />
elections have. The Board has found such conduct a violation of the<br />
section. In Matter of Kiddie Kover Manufacturing Company,28 a<br />
petition reciting that the signatories did "not want the union," because<br />
the company "will give us a square deal" was circulated among<br />
the employees with the active assistance of a supervisory official. In<br />
Matter of American Manufacturing Comparty, 29 the petition, circulated<br />
at the company's suggestion, called for an expression of satisfaction<br />
"with present conditions," and a renunciation of any desire<br />
for "outside representation." 3° In Matter of Sanshine Mining Com-<br />
Order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand. Inc.<br />
'<br />
94 F. (2c1)<br />
862 (C. C. A. 2d, 1938) ; certiorari denied, 304 U. S. 576, rehearing denied, 304 U. S. 590.<br />
28 Matter of Eagle Manufacturing Company and Steel Workers Organizing Committee,<br />
6 N. L. R. B. 492, order enforced in National Labor Relations Board v. Eagle Manufacturing<br />
Company, 4 dr., decided November 10, 1938.<br />
21 Matter of McNeely d Price Company and National Leather Workers Association,<br />
6 N. L. R. B 800.<br />
28 Matter of Arthur L. Colten, and A. J. Colman, co-partners, doing business as Kiddie<br />
%over Manufacturing Company, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 6 N. L.<br />
R. B. 355.<br />
29 Matter of American Manufacturing Company and Textile Workers' Organizing Committee,<br />
5 N. L. R. B. 443.<br />
See also Matter of Knoxville Glove Company and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />
5 N. L. R. B. 559, where the company's attorney prepared forms for withdrawal<br />
from the union, and the forms were distributed in the plant by supervisors.