07.02.2015 Views

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 213<br />

found that the procurement or execution, 67 or enforcement 68 of such<br />

contracts by the employer constituted or were part of the unfair labor<br />

practices."<br />

9. EFFECT ON <strong>BOARD</strong> ORDERS OF AGRFEMENTS I PURPORTING TO COMPROMISE UNFAIR<br />

<strong>LABOR</strong> PRACTICES<br />

The Board's power to prevent any person from engaging in any<br />

unfair labor practices affecting commerce is exclusive and cahnot be<br />

affected "by any other means of adjustment or prevention that has been<br />

or may be established by agreement, code, law, or otherwise." 7° The<br />

Board has stated that "no private party can sanction an employer's<br />

interference, restraint, or coercion in the exercise of the rights guaranteed<br />

by section 7 of the act, nor can such a party sanction unlawful<br />

domination, interference, or support of a labor organization by an<br />

employer, in contravention of the policies of the act.""<br />

When charges of unfair labor practice have been filed, the Board<br />

investigates any contract or agreement which purports to settle or<br />

compromise the charges. Ordinarily the Board will not interfere<br />

with a settlement or agreement between an employer and the union<br />

which effectuates the policies of the act,72 particularly if the agreement<br />

is concluded with the safeguard of the presence of a governmental<br />

representative.'3 If the Board finds that the agreement will<br />

effectuate the policies of the act, it ascertains whether the employer<br />

has substantially complied with its terms; if he has not, it issues<br />

appropriate orders. 74 When the facts relating to performance are<br />

in doubt, the Board has issued its order in the alternative."<br />

nothing in this order shall preclude the employer from hereafter making an agreement<br />

with Boot and Shoe Workers' Union or any labor organization (not established, maintained,<br />

or assisted by any action defined in the National Labor Relations Act as an unfair<br />

labor practice requiring, as a condition of employment, membership therein, if such labor<br />

organization is the representative of the employees as provided in Sec. 9 (a) of said Act."<br />

Also, "Cease and desist from recognizing Boot and Shoe Workers' Union as the exclusive<br />

representative of Its employees unless and until Boot and Shoe Workers' Union is certified<br />

as such by the Board").<br />

GT See, for example, Matter of Hopwood Retinning Co., Inc. and Monarch Retinning Co.,<br />

Inc., 4 N. L. R. B. 922, order quoted in note 64, supra, and enforced in National Labor !elation<br />

Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co., Inc.. 98 F. (2d) 97 (C. C. A. 2d, 1938) ; Matter of<br />

David C. Kennedy, Inc. and Isidore Greenberg, 6 N. L. R. B. 699.<br />

6s See for example, Matter of Highway Trailer Co. and United Automobile Workers of<br />

America, Local No. 135 and Local No. 136, 3 N. L. R. B. 591, order enforced upon consent<br />

in National Labor Relations Board v. Highway Trailer Co., 95 F. (2d) 1012 (C. C. A.<br />

7th. 1938) : Matter of National. Electric Products Corporation and United. Electrical and<br />

Radio Workers of America, Local No. 1073—B, 3 N. L. R. B. 475, order quoted in note 66,<br />

supra.<br />

'a See, for discussion, Matter of Atlas Bag and Burlap Company, Inc. and Milton. Rosenberg,<br />

Organizer, Burlap ef Cotton Bag Workers, Local Union No. 2469, affiliated with United<br />

Textile 1Vorkers Union, 1 N. L. R. B. 292;• Matter of Clinton Cotton Mills and Local No.<br />

2181, United Textile Workers of America, 1 N. L. R. B. 97 ; Matter of National Electric<br />

Products Corporation and United Electrical and Radio Workers of America, Local No. 509,<br />

3 N. L. R. B. 475; Matter of Consolidated Edison Company of 2%cto York, Inc., et al. and<br />

United Electrical and Radio Workers of America, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial<br />

Organization, 4 N. L. R. B. 71, order enforced in Consolidated Edison Co. v. National<br />

Labor Relations Board, 95 F. (2d) 390 (C. C. A. 2d), cert. granted 58 S. Ct. 1038.<br />

70 Sec. 10 (a), 49 Stat. 449.<br />

71. Matter of Ingram Manufacturing Company and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 908, 911.<br />

72 Matter of T. TV. Hepier and International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 7 N. L. R. B.<br />

255.<br />

"Matter of Ingram Manufacturing Company and Textile Workers Organizing Committee,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 908. 911. In numerous cases, the Board has approved stipulations entered<br />

into by parties to its proceedings, and has issued orders based upon such agreements.<br />

See, for example, Matter of David and Hyman Zoslow, trading as Golden Star Shoe<br />

Renewing Company, etc. and United Shoe Workers of America, Local No. 136, 4 N. L. R. B.<br />

829; Matter of Brown Shoe Oompany, Inc. and Boot, Shoe Worker's Union, Local 649,<br />

5 N. L. R. B. 212; Matter of Hatokeye Pearl Button Company and Amalgamated Clothing<br />

Workers of America. 7 N. L. R. B. 491.<br />

7* Batter of the Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. and United Rubber Workers of America, Local<br />

No. 26, and James H. Reed and Minnie Rank, 6 N. L. R. B. 325.<br />

75 Matter of T. TV. Hepler and International Ladies, Garment Workers Union, 7 N. L. R.<br />

B. 255 ("If the agreement for the reinstatement of strikers has not been complied with,<br />

upon application offer to those employees who went out on strike on May 26, 1937, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!