25.02.2015 Views

VOLUME I Multinational Maritime Tactical Instructions and Procedures

VOLUME I Multinational Maritime Tactical Instructions and Procedures

VOLUME I Multinational Maritime Tactical Instructions and Procedures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are available. This will add to the effectiveness of his forces, better ensure own aircraft safety, <strong>and</strong> minimize<br />

the confusion that would result in divided aircraft control.<br />

f. Antisurface Ship Missiles (ASSMs).<br />

(1) ASSM systems are divided into three categories.<br />

(a) Short range: Up to 20 miles (to-the-horizon ranges).<br />

(b) Medium range: From 20 to 75 miles.<br />

(C) Long range: More than 75 miles.<br />

The OTC should, if he has any choice, allocate units to the SAG with ASSM systems of sufficiently<br />

superior range <strong>and</strong> lethality to ensure success without needlessly wasting his most powerful<br />

assets.<br />

(2) The conflicting use of SAM systems for AAW on the one h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> for SAM in the surfaceto-surface<br />

(SASS) mode on the other must be carefully weighed by the OTC. Systems with more than<br />

one tracker can maintain both, although with reduced capabilities. However, most medium- <strong>and</strong><br />

long-range SAM systems have sufficient surface-to-surface capability to favorably influence the outcome<br />

of the surface action.<br />

8202 SURFACE ACTION GROUP POLICY<br />

In defense of the main body, the primary concern must be to remain between the enemy <strong>and</strong> the main<br />

body. If the SAG has been detached to destroy, neutralize, or repel missile carrier(s), the SAG should do so<br />

as far as possible from the main body or convoy. In formulating his policy, the SAG comm<strong>and</strong>er must consider<br />

the following factors:<br />

a. Relative capabilities of own <strong>and</strong> enemy forces.<br />

b. Likely tactics of enemy forces.<br />

c. The use of ECM. The SAG comm<strong>and</strong>er should make use of the ECM capability of ships of the<br />

SAG to disrupt enemy fire control, surface warning sensors, missile systems, <strong>and</strong> communications.<br />

d. The use of deception. When approaching the enemy, the SAG comm<strong>and</strong>er should consider the<br />

use of physical <strong>and</strong> electronic measures designed to conceal the size <strong>and</strong> formation of the SAG. The electronic<br />

emission pattern of the SAG must conform with the deception plan in use.<br />

e. The formation. It is important that deployment into the chosen surface-action formation should<br />

have been completed before action commences. The surface-action formation must allow ships to engage<br />

with all their weapons, <strong>and</strong> to take avoiding action without endangering adjacent ships. Unnecessarily<br />

large intervals between ships give an enemy with superior speed the opportunity to concentrate on one part<br />

of the group at a time.<br />

f. Pre-action fire control settings. It is vital that these are obtained as early in the action as possible.<br />

Thus, initial settings on fire control equipment must be accurate. However, fire control is vulnerable to<br />

jamming <strong>and</strong> therefore calibration involving fire control radar transmissions may be inadvisable <strong>and</strong><br />

should only be carried out on instruction from the SAG comm<strong>and</strong>er.<br />

g. Fire distribution.<br />

MTP 1(D), Vol. I<br />

8-10 CHANGE 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!