VOLUME I Multinational Maritime Tactical Instructions and Procedures

a. That the task, pertinent ROE and political policy are accurately and unambiguously defined. In
particular both politicians and the military must be agreed on the concept of what is both achievable and allowed.
This is of importance when dealing diplomatically with the nation or group against whom the operation
is directed and when planning information operations/media coverage. The task, ROE and political
policy must subsequently be promulgated widely in the OPGEN.
b. That the legal basis of the task is established and that the legal limits of what action is or is not permitted
are known. This must be thoroughly understood by all subordinate commanders.
c. The level of risk of damage and casualties that are politically acceptable has been established.
d. That an “in-depth” threat analysis is carried out on any likely aggressor nation.
MTP 1(D), Vol. I
e. That, in light of the above, the force mix and capabilities match the demands of the task. If this is
not the case, representations must be made to either alter or add to the Task Force or reduce the scope of the
task.
f. That a thorough environmental brief is obtained on the geographical area of operations. This
should include predictive analysis of weapon and sensor performance, particularly as affected by the littoral
environment.
that:
g. That Rules of Engagement (ROE) are critically examined. The TF Commander must be satisfied
(1) Self-defense of the force within the level of acceptable risk is possible in light of the known capabilities
of any potentially hostile nation.
(2) Units will be able to carry out their task. With a detailed knowledge of the characteristics of his
own units’ weapons and sensors coupled with examination of the restrictions placed on their use, he
must establish that the task remains achievable. In particular he must be sure that any graduated response
called for is possible and permissible with the weapons and sensors carried. For example, weapons
relying on a laser-based fire control system would not be available when the use of lasers is
prohibited.
(3) Intelligence gathering is permitted by the ROE profile.
(4) ROE changes required to meet foreseeable contingencies are highlighted and prepared.
(5) ROE are common to all TF units and similarly understood. In particular any national reservations
must be known. If ROE differences exist between units it should be clearly stated and known to all.
h. If the examination process above reveals deficiencies, ROE requests are raised to remedy them,
including full justification for each additional rule or change.
i. A formal ROE brief is carried out for all units. In some cases it may be necessary for formal certification
of this briefing to be made to an external authority.
j. That a pre-sail meeting is carried out between all participating forces including shore-based assets
and HQs. This should cover briefing on the task and on individual units’ capabilities and limitations in order
that a full understanding of the commitment and individual potential contributions is achieved. If units join
the TF without attending this meeting, briefings should be carried out by CTF/CTG staff on arrival.
8-39 CHANGE 2