Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

BCIs in the Laboratory and at Home: The Wadsworth Research Program 109
References
1. B.Z. Allison and J.A. Pineda, ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: Implications for a brain
computer interface (BCI) system, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng, 11, 110–113, (2003).
2. B.Z. Allison and J.A. Pineda, Effects of SOA and flash pattern manipulations on ERPs, performance,
and preference: Implications for a BCI system. Int J Psychophysiol, 59, 127–140,
(2006).
3. B.Z. Allison, E.W. Wolpaw, and J.R. Wolpaw, Brain-computer interface systems: progress and
prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices, 4, 463–474, (2007).
4. N. Birbaumer, et al., A spelling device for the paralyzed. Nature, 398, 297–298, (1999).
5. N. Birbaumer, et al., The thought translation device (TTD) for completely paralyzed patients.
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, 8, 190–193, (2000).
6. N. Birbaumer, T. Hinterberger A. Kübler, and N. Neumann, The thought translation device
(TTD): neurobehavioral mechanisms and clinical outcome. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab
Eng, 11, 120–3, (2003).
7. B. Blankertz et al., Boosting bit rates and error detection for the classification of fast-paced
motor commands based on single-trial EEG analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng, 11,
127–31, (2003).
8. B. Cacace, D.J. and McFarland, Spectral dynamics of electroencephalographic activity during
auditory information processing. Hearing Res, 176, 25–41, (2003).
9. L. Citi, R. Poli, C. Cinel, and F. Sepulveda, P300-based brain computer interface with
genetically-optimised analogue control. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng, 16, 51–61,
(2008).
10. J. Cohen, and J. Polich, On the number of trials needed for P300. Int J Psychophysiol, 25,
249–55, (1997).
11. J. Dien, K.M Spencer, and E. Donchin, Localization of the event-related potential novelty
response as defined by principal components analysis. Cognitive Brain Research, 17,
637–650, (2003).
12. E. Donchin, K.M. Spencer, R. Wijesinghe, The mental prosthesis: Assessing the speed of a
P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, 8, 174–179, (2000).
13. J. Doyon, V. Penhue, and L.G .Ungerleider, Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and
cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia, 41, 252–262, (2003).
14. C. Duncan – Johnson, E. Donchin, On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related
potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456–467, (1977).
15. R.G. Eason, Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective
attention, Bull Psychonomic Soc, 18, 203–206, (1981).
16. M. Fabiani, G. Gratton, D. Karis, and E. Donchin, Definition, identification and reliability of
measurement of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential. Adv Psychophysiol,
2, 1–78, (1987).
17. L.A. Farwell and E. Donchin, Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis
utilizing event-related brain potentials, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 70, 510–523,
(1988).
18. M.R. Harter, C. Aine, and C. Schroder, Hemispheric differences in the neural processing
of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials.
Neuropsychologia, 20, 421–438, (1982).
19. S.A. Hillyard and T.F. Munte, Selective attention to color and location cues: An analysis with
event-related brain potentials. Perception Psychophys, 36, 185–198, (1984).
20. M. Kaper, P. Meinicke, U. Grossekathoefer, T. Lingner, and H. Ritter, BCI Competition 2003-
Data set Iib: Support vector machines for the P300 speller paradigm. IEEE Trans Biomed
Eng, 51, 1073–1076, (2004).
21. D.J. Krusienski, E.W. Sellers, , F. Cabestaing, S. Bayoudh, D.J. McFarland, T.M. Vaughan,
and J.R. Wolpaw, A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 speller. J Neural
Eng, 3, 299–305, (2006).