16.11.2012 Views

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Detecting Mental States by Machine Learning<br />

Techniques: The Berlin Brain–Computer<br />

Interface<br />

Benjamin Blankertz, Michael Tangermann, Carmen Vidaurre,<br />

Thorsten Dickhaus, Claudia Sannelli, Florin Popescu, Siamac Fazli,<br />

Márton Danóczy, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller<br />

1 Introduction<br />

The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI) uses a machine learning approach<br />

to extract user-specific patterns from high-dimensional EEG-features optimized for<br />

revealing the user’s mental state. Classical BCI applications are brain actuated tools<br />

for patients such as prostheses (see Section 4.1) or mental text entry systems ([1]<br />

and see [2–5] for an overview on BCI). In these applications, the BBCI uses natural<br />

motor skills <strong>of</strong> the users and specifically tailored pattern recognition algorithms for<br />

detecting the user’s intent. But beyond rehabilitation, there is a wide range <strong>of</strong> possible<br />

applications in which BCI technology is used to monitor other mental states,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten even covert ones (see also [6] in the fMRI realm). While this field is still<br />

largely unexplored, two examples from our studies are exemplified in Sections 4.3<br />

and 4.4.<br />

1.1 The Machine Learning Approach<br />

The advent <strong>of</strong> machine learning (ML) in the field <strong>of</strong> BCI has led to significant<br />

advances in real-time EEG analysis. While early EEG-BCI efforts required neur<strong>of</strong>eedback<br />

training on the part <strong>of</strong> the user that lasted on the order <strong>of</strong> days, in ML-based<br />

systems it suffices to collect examples <strong>of</strong> EEG signals in a so-called calibration during<br />

which the user is cued to perform repeatedly any one <strong>of</strong> a small set <strong>of</strong> mental<br />

tasks. This data is used to adapt the system to the specific brain signals <strong>of</strong> each<br />

user (machine training). This step <strong>of</strong> adaption seems to be instrumental for effective<br />

BCI performance due to a large inter-subject variability with respect to the brain<br />

signals [7]. After this preparation step, which is very short compared to the subject<br />

B. Blankertz (B)<br />

Machine Learning Laboratory, Berlin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Berlin, Germany; Fraunh<strong>of</strong>er<br />

FIRST (IDA), Berlin,Germany<br />

e-mail: blanker@cs.tu-berlin.de<br />

B. Graimann et al. (eds.), Brain–Computer <strong>Interfaces</strong>, The Frontiers Collection,<br />

DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02091-9_7, C○ Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!