16.11.2012 Views

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

164 N. Birbaumer and P. Sauseng<br />

<strong>of</strong> the BOLD response (BOLD – blood oxygen level dependent) with a delay <strong>of</strong><br />

3s from the neuronal response to the hemodynamic change (see [10, 23, 36]). The<br />

laboratory <strong>of</strong> the author reported the first successful and well-controlled studies <strong>of</strong><br />

subcortical fMRI-BCI systems (see [36] for a summary). Figure 4 shows the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> operant conditioning <strong>of</strong> the anterior insula within 3 training sessions, each session<br />

lasting 10 min. Subjects received feedback <strong>of</strong> their BOLD response in the Region<strong>of</strong>-interest<br />

with a red or blue arrow, red arrow indicated increase <strong>of</strong> BOLD in the<br />

respective area relative to baseline, the blue arrow pointing downwards indicated a<br />

decrease <strong>of</strong> BOLD referred to baseline. Before and after training subjects were presented<br />

with a selection <strong>of</strong> emotional pictures from the International Affective Picture<br />

System (IAPS [21]) presenting negative and neutral emotional slides. As shown in<br />

Fig. 4 subjects achieved a surprising degree <strong>of</strong> control over their brain activity in<br />

an area strongly connected to paralimbic area, being one <strong>of</strong> phylogenetically oldest<br />

“cortical” areas generating mainly negative emotional states.<br />

Figure 4 also shows that, after training, subjects indicated a specific increase<br />

in aversion to negative emotional slides only. Neutral slides were not affected by<br />

the training <strong>of</strong> BOLD increase in the anterior insula, proving the anatomical specificity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the effect. The rest <strong>of</strong> the brain was controlled for concomitant increases<br />

or decreases and it was demonstrated that no general arousal or general increase or<br />

decrease <strong>of</strong> brain activity is responsible for the behavioral effects. In addition, two<br />

control groups one with inconsistent feedback and another with instructions to emotional<br />

imagery only did not show a learned increase in BOLD in the anterior insula<br />

nor behavioral emotional valence specific effects on emotion.<br />

Conditioning <strong>of</strong> subcortical areas such as the anterior cingulate and the amygdala<br />

were also reported. Ongoing studies investigating the possibility <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />

and decreasing dynamic connectivity between different brain areas by presenting<br />

feedback only if increased connectivity between the selected areas is produced voluntarily<br />

are promising. Most behavioral responses depend not on a single brain<br />

area but on the collaboration or disconnection between particular brain areas;<br />

behavioural effects should be much larger for connectivity training than for the<br />

training <strong>of</strong> single brain areas alone.<br />

Two clinical applications <strong>of</strong> the fMRI-BCI were reported: DeCharms et al. [11]<br />

showed effects <strong>of</strong> anterior cingulate training on chronic pain and our laboratory<br />

showed that criminal psychopaths are able to regulate their underactivated anterior<br />

insula response (see [6]). Whether this has a lasting effect on the behavioral<br />

outcome <strong>of</strong> criminal psychopaths remains to be demonstrated. However, the direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> research is highly promising and studies on the conditioning <strong>of</strong> depression<br />

relevant areas and on schizophrenia are on the way in our laboratory.<br />

The remarkable ease and speed <strong>of</strong> voluntary control <strong>of</strong> vascular brain response<br />

such as BOLD suggests a superior learning <strong>of</strong> instrumental control for these<br />

response categories. EEG, spike trains, and electrocorticographic activity all need<br />

extended training for voluntary control. Vascular responses seem to be easier to<br />

regulate, probably because the brain receives feedback <strong>of</strong> the dynamic status <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vascular system, and these visceral perceptions allow for a better regulation <strong>of</strong> a nonmotor<br />

response which can not be detected by the brain in neuroelectric responses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!