Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

BCIs Based on Signals from Between the Brain and Skull 237
be applicable to smaller electrodes recording local field potentials, and perhaps
eventually to microelectrodes. As shown by the ECoG work in the last decade, methods
from both EEG and single cell recordings have now been successfully applied to
ECoG signals. Therefore, it is reasonable to suppose that methods developed using
ECoG could also be applied to other types of recorded brain activity.
References
1. P.R. Kennedy, M.T. Kirby, M.M. Moore, B. King, A. Mallory, Computer control using
human intracortical local field potentials. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 12, 339–344,
(2004).
2. T.C. Marzullo, J.R. Dudley, C.R. Miller, L. Trejo, D.R. Kipke, Spikes, local field potentials,
and electrocorticogram characterization during motor learning in rats for brain machine
interface tasks. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 1, 429–431, (2005).
3. S.P. Levine, J.E. Huggins, S.L. BeMent, et al., Identification of electrocorticogram patterns as
the basis for a direct brain interface. J Clin Neurophysiol, 16, 439–447, (1999).
4. E.C. Leuthardt, G. Schalk, J.R. Wolpaw, J.G. Ojemann, D.W. Moran, A brain-computer
interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J Neural Eng, 1, 63–71, (2004).
5. J.C. Sanchez, A. Gunduz, P.R. Carney, J.C. Principe, Extraction and localization of mesoscopic
motor control signals for human ECoG neuroprosthetics. J Neurosci Methods, 167,
63–81, (2008).
6. T. Pistohl, T. Ball, A. Schulze-Bonhage, A. Aertsen, C. Mehring, Prediction of arm movement
trajectories from ECoG-recordings in humans. J Neurosci Methods, 167, 105–114, (2008).
7. J.A. Wilson, E.A. Felton, P.C. Garell, G. Schalk, J.C. Williams, ECoG factors underlying
multimodal control of a brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 14,
246–250, (2006).
8. E.E. Sutter, The brain response interface: Communication through visually-induced electrical
brain responses. J Microcomput Appl, 15, 31–45, (1992).
9. V. Salanova, H.H. Morris 3rd, P.C. Van Ness, H. Luders, D. Dinner, E. Wyllie, Comparison
of scalp electroencephalogram with subdural electrocorticogram recordings and functional
mapping in frontal lobe epilepsy. Arch Neurol, 50, 294–299, (1993).
10. B. Graimann, G. Townsend, J.E. Huggins, S.P. Levine, and G. Pfurtscheller, A Comparison
between using ECoG and EEG for direct brain communication. IFMBE proceedings
EMBEC05 3rd European medical & biological engineering conference, IFMBE European
Conference on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 11, 2005, Prague, Czech Republic, CD.
11. F. Popescu, S. Fazli, Y. Badower, B. Blankertz, K.R. Muller, Single trial classification of motor
imagination using 6 dry EEG electrodes. PLoS ONE, 2, e637, (2007).
12. W.J. Heetderks, A.B. Schwartz, Command-control signals from the neural activity of motor
cortical cells: Joy-stick control. Proc RESNA ’95, 15, 664–666, (1995).
13. P.R. Kennedy, R.A. Bakay, M.M. Moore, K. Adams, J. Goldwaithe, Direct control of a
computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, 8, 198–202,
(2000).
14. L.R. Hochberg, M.D. Serruya, G.M. Friehs, et al., Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic
devices by a human with tetraplegia.see comment. Nature, 442, 164–171, (2006).
15. E. Margalit, J.D. Weiland, R.E. Clatterbuck, et al., Visual and electrical evoked response
recorded from subdural electrodes implanted above the visual cortex in normal dogs under
two methods of anesthesia. J Neurosci Methods, 123, 129–137, (2003).
16. E.M. Schmidt, Single neuron recording from motor cortex as a possible source of signals for
control of external devices. Ann Biomed Eng, 8, 339–349, (1980).
17. E.A. Felton, J.A. Wilson, J.C. Williams, P.C. Garell, Electrocorticographically controlled
brain-computer interfaces using motor and sensory imagery in patients with temporary
subdural electrode implants. Report of four cases. J Neurosurg, 106, 495–500, (2007).