16.11.2012 Views

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

Brain–Computer Interfaces - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 G. Pfurtscheller and C. Neuper<br />

Fig. 8 Mean ERD ± SD<br />

over central regions during<br />

viewing a static versus<br />

moving hand or cube<br />

(modified from [80])<br />

neuron system. This system is an action observation/execution matching system<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> performing an internal simulation <strong>of</strong> the observed action (for a review<br />

see [81, 82]). This line <strong>of</strong> research started on the discovery <strong>of</strong> so-called mirror neurons<br />

in cortical area F5 <strong>of</strong> macaque monkeys, which are active both in observing<br />

and executing a movement [83–85]. Based on functional imaging studies, evidence<br />

for a comparable mirror neuron system has been also demonstrated in humans<br />

[86], showing a functional correspondence between action observation, internal<br />

simulation or motor imagery, and execution <strong>of</strong> the motor action [87].<br />

Specifically, it has been proposed that the mu rhythm may reflect the downstream<br />

modulation <strong>of</strong> primary sensorimotor neurons by mirror neurons in the inferior<br />

frontal gyrus [88, 89]. The underlying idea is that activation <strong>of</strong> mirror neurons by<br />

either executed, imagined or observed motor actions produces asynchronous firing,<br />

and is therefore associated with a concomitant suppression or desynchronization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mu rhythm [90]. This is supported by MEG findings about activation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

viewer’s motor cortex [82]. Hari and coworker showed that the 20-Hz rebound after<br />

median-nerve stimulation is not only suppressed when the subject moves the fingers<br />

or manipulates a small object, but also – although significantly weaker – when the<br />

subject just views another person’s manipulation movements [91]. Interestingly, the<br />

suppression <strong>of</strong> the rebound is stronger for motor acts presented live than those seen<br />

on a video [92].<br />

The fact that similar brain signals, i.e. oscillations in the mu and beta frequency<br />

bands, react to both motor imagery and observation <strong>of</strong> biological movement may

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!