18.11.2012 Views

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

After the “Descent to the Everyday” 53<br />

In the second phase, the “descent to the everyday” began within<br />

the site of exhibition from around 1958, as Anti-Art artists and individual<br />

members of collectives—most notoriously, Kyushu-ha, Neo Dada (renamed<br />

from “Neo Dada Organizers”), Group Ongaku (Music), Hi Red Center, and<br />

Jikan-ha (Time School)—incorporated junk and everyday objects into their<br />

works, partly inspired by the fervor of Art Informel. 21<br />

The third phase was the “descent to everyday life.” On the one<br />

hand, some objects incorporated into works had a tendency themselves to<br />

move about inside the exhibition site and depart from it, as with the famed<br />

examples of Takamatsu Jiro’s string and Nakanishi Natsuyuki’s clothespins<br />

(both HRC members), shown at the “Yomiuri Independent” in 1963. 22 On<br />

the other hand, artists themselves were deWnitely an agency of the descent,<br />

taking their actions to the streets, often in order to promote their exhibitions.<br />

An unexpected precedent was found in Nika: in 1948, when the reorganized<br />

Nika began a tradition of scandalous publicity stunts, sending a<br />

truckload of costumed members and semi-nude models to the Ginza district<br />

in Tokyo on the eve of their exhibition opening, with some luridness even<br />

displayed as a calculated accident. The costume parade to Ginza was subsequently<br />

banned, 23 but Nika’s “Opening-Eve Festival” preceded Kyushu-ha’s<br />

street exhibition in 1957, Neo Dada Organizers’ street demonstrations in<br />

1960, and Zero Dimension’s crawling and other rituals since 1963, which in<br />

turn preceded HRC’s extraexhibition performance works. The Anpo ’60<br />

struggle was an undeniable inXuence in their move out of the exhibition<br />

hall: an urgent desire for “direct action” (chokusetsu kodo) lingered, <strong>after</strong> the<br />

protest movement waned. It should be noted that parallel phenomena of<br />

“descent to everyday life” also took place in other cultural Welds during this<br />

decade. Most signiWcantly, troupes of underground theater (Angura engeki)<br />

such as Kara Juro’s Red Tent and Theater Center 68/70’s Black Tent were<br />

launched in 1967 and 1970, respectively; the playwright Terayama Shuji,<br />

who initiated the move out of traditional theater places, exploited the idea<br />

of “street theater” with his Tenjo Sajiki group in 1970. 24<br />

In a sense, the departure from the exhibition was another face of<br />

the dematerialization of art. As practitioners moved from the combat zone of<br />

Anti-Art to the no-man’s-land of Non-Art, object-based works were quickly<br />

replaced by works based on installation, conceptualism, and performance,<br />

the last of which was varyingly called “action” (akushon or koi), “Happening”<br />

(hapuningu), “event” (ivento), and “ritual” (gishiki) in Japan. The “descent<br />

to everyday life,” epitomized by HRC’s Cleaning Event, meant in real life the<br />

inWltration of the public sphere, often performed by collectives with an interventional<br />

intent. Accordingly, the nature of collectivism changed. Although<br />

the exhibition remained a key concern, vanguard collectives to a greater

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!