Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs
Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs
Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Production of Social Space as Artwork 233<br />
For those Africans who disavow the Wction of authenticity—the<br />
mimetic excess par excellence—what choice do they have beyond the violence<br />
of the dichotomy between the fake and real, 21 authentic and inauthentic,<br />
primordialism (backwardness) and modernity (progress), the universal<br />
and the particular? If we are to hypothesize authenticity what else could it<br />
mean beyond its interpretation as an act of constant self-repetition, selfmimicry,<br />
and self-abasement in the stew of origin? Shouldn’t we begin the<br />
quest for the authentic in African cultural discourse Wrst by ridding ourselves<br />
of all illusions that it can be conjured by a simple appeal to the past and tradition?<br />
Second, should we not be insisting that the most meaningful place<br />
to seek the Wgure of the authentic is not in the swamp of fantasies in which<br />
Africa has been caught as the true historical opposition between reason and<br />
unreason, between the West and the rest, but elsewhere: in the politics of<br />
the subject? The quest for the authentic it seems to me is in the search to<br />
locate the African subject, not simply as African (for that is already a given),<br />
but as a universal subject endowed with capacities far beyond the lure of<br />
authenticity. Such a subject is neither a mere fantasy of overdetermined cultural<br />
theory nor a fanciful postmodern caricature. We can therefore present<br />
the case of the African subject in the following manner:<br />
the constitution of the African self as a reXexive subject . . . involves doing, seeing, hearing,<br />
tasting, feeling, and touching. In the eyes of all involved in the production of that self<br />
and subject, these practices constitute what might be called meaningful human expressions.<br />
Thus the African subject is like any other human being: he or she engages in meaningful<br />
acts. . . . the African subject does not exist apart from the acts that produce social reality,<br />
or apart from the process by which those practices, are so to speak, imbued with meaning. 22<br />
If the speech of the African subject is imbued with meaning at the<br />
moment he/she speaks (whether as an artist or not), cultural subjectivity for<br />
the modern African artist opposes itself to the binary violence of either/or,<br />
universalism/particularism. The complexity of such a speech extrudes from<br />
the dynamism of multiple traditions and is transformed in the aleatory patterns<br />
of juxtaposition, mixing, and creolizations that deWne the contact zone<br />
of culture, especially <strong>after</strong> colonialism.<br />
As I have tried to show, the discourse of crisis 23 is not only endemic to the<br />
political and social formation in Africa, it also concerns the crisis evident<br />
in the processes of subjectivization, that is, the ability to constitute a speech<br />
not marked by the failure of intelligibility and communicability. The process<br />
of subjectivization, which I will also deWne as the ability for a given subject<br />
to articulate an <strong>autonomous</strong> position, to acquire the tools and power of<br />
speech (be it in art, writing, or other expressive and reXexive actions), is<br />
connected to the idea of sovereignty. This sovereignty operates around the