18.11.2012 Views

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166 Rubén Gallo<br />

individualistic production and reception of art (a process that followed a capitalist<br />

model) with an art form that was collectively produced (a large team<br />

of painters and helpers was needed to paint a mural) and destined for collective<br />

reception (large crowds could stand in front of a mural and study its<br />

message). Starting in the 1920s, the PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party)<br />

governments supported mural painting through hundreds of generous commissions<br />

and grants.<br />

Paradoxically, though most murals were the work of collectives,<br />

they were signed by individuals, thus perpetuating the myth of the single<br />

author. The murals at Mexico City’s Secretaría de Educación Pública, for<br />

example, were painted by a team of hundreds of painters, plasterers, manual<br />

laborers, and assistants—including well-known artists like Jean Charlot—yet<br />

they were signed only by Diego Rivera. It is one of the ironies of Mexican<br />

muralism that a movement predicated on collectivism and socialist values<br />

led to the gloriWcation of a handful of individuals—Rivera, David Alfro<br />

Siqueiros, and Clemente Orozco—who would go down in history as los tres<br />

grandes (the three great muralists), a label that condemns to oblivion the<br />

numerous artists that collaborated in their projects.<br />

In the 1930s there was a different experiment with collectivism in<br />

the arts: the workshop known as Taller de GráWca Popular (TGP), founded<br />

in 1937 by a handful of artists and devoted to printing posters, Xyers, and<br />

other “graphics” with overtly political subjects. The TGP was founded by<br />

Leopoldo Méndez, Pablo O’Higgins, and Luis Arenal. Though its members<br />

came together to discuss political issues and their relation to art practice, most<br />

of them signed their works as individuals: for them collectivism was about<br />

political discussion and strategizing, but when it came to authorship, most<br />

members preferred to be known as individuals. 1<br />

During the 1950s and 1960s Mexican artists expressed little interest<br />

in collectivism. These two decades saw the rise of “the generation of rupture,”<br />

a group of younger artists—including Manuel Felguérez and Fernando<br />

García Ponce—who broke with muralism and embraced both abstract painting<br />

and the myth of the single author. If murals were painted by collectives,<br />

the works of the rupture were painted by individuals; if the former aspired<br />

to represent the Mexican nation, the latter focused merely on the painter’s<br />

subjective experiences. The shift to abstraction was a return to the Romantic<br />

myth of the creative genius.<br />

THE GROUPS<br />

The next wave of artistic experiments with collectivism did not come until<br />

the 1970s, with the emergence of a dozen artists’ collectives known as los

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!