18.11.2012 Views

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

distributed a statement of protest, passed off as a statement by the entire<br />

group even though the other members disagreed with the tactic. 106<br />

In a bitter irony, the group’s identity was by then well established<br />

in the public’s mind and, despite the poor relations among them, ABTV<br />

cynically decided to proceed as a collective in order to participate in the<br />

various important exhibitions to which they had begun to be invited. The<br />

actual collective process of working, however, was abandoned: ABTV was<br />

now four artists in collective drag. “We were apart from each other for about<br />

a year without having any relationship at all, but what happens? Now we<br />

were somehow ofWcially a group, and from a practical point of view we began<br />

to appreciate the beneWts that that brought us, cynically . . . so then it was<br />

a much more pragmatic relationship in that each of us took whatever artistic<br />

opportunities were offered to us but excluded the others as authors. And<br />

that way, for example, ‘ABTV’ participated in various ways when in fact<br />

they were individual participations. It went on like that for some time . . .<br />

we committed hara-kiri you might say, we pushed aside all the personal problems<br />

and we concentrated on the professional reasons and we did the projects.<br />

The personal relations were not good but . . . it was an example of discipline,<br />

and of love for the work.” 107 As the confrontation with power became<br />

more protracted, as moderate ofWcials were replaced with enforcers, as individual<br />

positions among artists became more clearly delineated, things began<br />

to fall apart, and the only glue left was the career beneWt of the group’s<br />

brand name. The collective that, perhaps even more than the others, had<br />

evolved Xuidly out of friendship and artistic afWnities, dissolved into a cynical<br />

maneuver.<br />

A COLLECTIVE OF COLLECTIVES<br />

Performing Revolution 135<br />

What happened in the second half of the 1980s resembled in many ways what<br />

Thomas Kuhn has described as the structure of scientiWc revolutions: 108 a<br />

normally slow and gradual evolutionary process, stable in its environmental<br />

adaptation, is suddenly accelerated into a “revolution” when that environment<br />

is disturbed by the emergence of new ideas powerful enough to overthrow<br />

the prevailing theory. According to this analogy, the rupture came<br />

with Volumen Uno, and what developed in the latter half of the decade constituted<br />

a body of ideas sufWciently strong to sustain that rupture beyond<br />

a momentary convulsion into an authentic and signiWcant change in the environment.<br />

Arte Calle, Grupo Provisional, and other groups Xourished between<br />

1984 and the end of the decade, producing not only an extraordinary number<br />

of exhibitions and events but also, more broadly, a supercharged and superenergized<br />

atmosphere. By 1988, the accumulated impact of it all brought

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!