18.11.2012 Views

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

Collectivism after Modernism - autonomous learning - Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64 Reiko Tomii<br />

locales.” 57 There were six mailings, from December 1969 through May 1970,<br />

plus one “<strong>after</strong> May 10, 1970, 12:00.” Altogether sixteen “institutes” contributed,<br />

seven of them being identiWed with their locations and the rest with their<br />

family name. For example, Morocco Research Institute was Wada Hideo’s<br />

tag; and Matsuzawa contributed twice as Matsuzawa Research Institute from<br />

Nagano Prefecture. The participants mailed to the “bureau” (maintained by<br />

Ina and Takeda) their works, which the bureau duplicated by high-quality<br />

Xeroxing, and these copies were sent to all the participants, naturally via<br />

postal mail. Thus, the institute successfully achieved its goal of “gathering<br />

and dispersing the documents of actions or nonactions by individuals who<br />

refused to have direct contact.” 58<br />

The total of sixty-eight submissions reveals a gamut of conceptual<br />

practices. Participating in all seven mailings, the mail artist Horikawa<br />

Michio contributed methodologically tautological entries as the Niigata<br />

Research Institute: he sent the documents of his mail-art works. Two of them<br />

were his signature “political stones,” sent to the American president Richard<br />

Nixon (December 1969) and Japan’s prime minister Sato Eisaku (May 1970),<br />

to appeal for world peace in the midst of the Vietnam War (see Figure 2.5). 59<br />

An odd man out in the group of mainly cerebral practitioners was Itoi Kanji,<br />

a resident of Sendai known as “Dada Kan.” An individual counterpart to<br />

Zero Dimension, his Ritualist work consisted of streaking in public places.<br />

As Itoi Research Institute, he contributed to the sixth mailing a photo collage<br />

related to his successful run at Expo ’70 in Osaka on April 27, 1970.<br />

The Play: Voyages into Landscape<br />

Mr. Technology walks on the moon. What will Mr. Play et al. do?<br />

Mr. Student Radical causes a bloodshed again. What will Mr. Play et al. do?<br />

Mr. Painting Wlls a white space. What will Mr. Play et al. do?<br />

. . .<br />

Mr. Expo stumbles. What will Mr. Play et al. do?<br />

Mr. Zero does a body ritual. What will Mr. Play et al. do?<br />

. . .<br />

Mr. Image cans the sky. What will Mr. Play et al. do?<br />

Mr. Play et al. prove the being. What will Mr. Play et al. do?<br />

Mr. Play et al. make a voyage. What will Mr. Play et al. do? 60<br />

In the mid- to late 1960s, two realities coexisted in Japan: a political uproar<br />

that wrought chaos nationwide and an economic success that bred everyday<br />

complacency. To stir content quotidian consciousness, some collectives variously<br />

explored the ideas of going beyond the urban streets. Sightseeing was<br />

one such direction. Sightseeing Art Research Institute (Kanko Geijutsu Kenkyujo),<br />

active 1964–66, was founded by the painters Tateishi Koichi and<br />

Nakamura Hiroshi to make art more accessible to society. 61 In 1966, Fluxus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!