10.07.2015 Views

IPCC_Managing Risks of Extreme Events.pdf - Climate Access

IPCC_Managing Risks of Extreme Events.pdf - Climate Access

IPCC_Managing Risks of Extreme Events.pdf - Climate Access

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3Changes in <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Extreme</strong>s and their Impacts on the Natural Physical EnvironmentTable 3-1 | Overview <strong>of</strong> considered extremes and summary <strong>of</strong> observed and projected changes at a global scale. Regional details on observed and projected changes in temperatureand precipitation extremes are provided in Tables 3-2 and 3-3. <strong>Extreme</strong>s (e.g., cold/warm days/nights, heat waves, heavy precipitation events) are defined with respect to late 20thcenturyclimate (see also Box 3-1 for discussion <strong>of</strong> reference period).Observed Changes (since 1950)Attribution <strong>of</strong> ObservedChangesProjected Changes (up to 2100) withRespect to Late 20th CenturyWeatherand<strong>Climate</strong>VariablesTemperature(Section 3.3.1)Precipitation(Section 3.3.2)Very likely decrease in number <strong>of</strong> unusually cold daysand nights at the global scale. Very likely increase innumber <strong>of</strong> unusually warm days and nights at theglobal scale. Medium confidence in increase in lengthor number <strong>of</strong> warm spells or heat waves in many (butnot all) regions. Low or medium confidence in trends intemperature extremes in some subregions due eitherto lack <strong>of</strong> observations or varying signal withinsubregions. [Regional details in Table 3-2]Likely statistically significant increases in the number<strong>of</strong> heavy precipitation events (e.g., 95th percentile) inmore regions than those with statistically significantdecreases, but strong regional and subregionalvariations in the trends. [Regional details in Table 3-2]Likely anthropogenic influence ontrends in warm/cold days/nights atthe global scale. No attribution <strong>of</strong>trends at a regional scale with afew exceptions.Medium confidence thatanthropogenic influences havecontributed to intensification <strong>of</strong>extreme precipitation at the globalscale.Virtually certain decrease in frequency and magnitude<strong>of</strong> unusually cold days and nights at the global scale.Virtually certain increase in frequency and magnitude<strong>of</strong> unusually warm days and nights at the global scale.Very likely increase in length, frequency, and/orintensity <strong>of</strong> warm spells or heat waves over most landareas. [Regional details in Table 3-3]Likely increase in frequency <strong>of</strong> heavy precipitationevents or increase in proportion <strong>of</strong> total rainfall fromheavy falls over many areas <strong>of</strong> the globe, in particularin the high latitudes and tropical regions, and inwinter in the northern mid-latitudes. [Regional detailsin Table 3-3]Winds(Section 3.3.3)Low confidence in trends due to insufficient evidence.Low confidence in the causes <strong>of</strong>trends due to insufficient evidence.Low confidence in projections <strong>of</strong> extreme winds (withthe exception <strong>of</strong> wind extremes associated withtropical cyclones).PhenomenaRelated toWeather and<strong>Climate</strong><strong>Extreme</strong>sMonsoons(Section 3.4.1)El Niño andother Modes <strong>of</strong>Variability(Sections 3.4.2and 3.4.3)Low confidence in trends because <strong>of</strong> insufficientevidence.Medium confidence in past trends toward morefrequent central equatorial Pacific El Niño-SouthernOscillation (ENSO) events.Insufficient evidence for more specific statements onENSO trends.Likely trends in Southern Annular Mode (SAM).Low confidence due to insufficientevidence.Likely anthropogenic influence onidentified trends in SAM. 1Anthropogenic influence on trendsin North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)are about as likely as not. Noattribution <strong>of</strong> changes in ENSO.Low confidence in projected changes in monsoons,because <strong>of</strong> insufficient agreement between climatemodels.Low confidence in projections <strong>of</strong> changes in behavior<strong>of</strong> ENSO and other modes <strong>of</strong> variability because <strong>of</strong>insufficient agreement <strong>of</strong> model projections.TropicalCyclones(Section 3.4.4)ExtratropicalCyclones(Section 3.4.5)Low confidence that any observed long-term (i.e., 40years or more) increases in tropical cyclone activity arerobust, after accounting for past changes in observingcapabilities.Likely poleward shift in extratropical cyclones.Low confidence in regional changes in intensity.Low confidence in attribution <strong>of</strong>any detectable changes in tropicalcyclone activity to anthropogenicinfluences (due to uncertainties inhistorical tropical cyclones record,incomplete understanding <strong>of</strong>physical mechanisms, and degree<strong>of</strong> tropical cyclone variability).Medium confidence in ananthropogenic influence onpoleward shift.Likely decrease or no change in frequency <strong>of</strong> tropicalcyclones.Likely increase in mean maximum wind speed, butpossibly not in all basins.Likely increase in heavy rainfall associated withtropical cyclones.Likely impacts on regional cyclone activity but lowconfidence in detailed regional projections due to onlypartial representation <strong>of</strong> relevant processes in currentmodels.Medium confidence in a reduction in the numbers <strong>of</strong>mid-latitude storms.Medium confidence in projected poleward shift <strong>of</strong>mid-latitude storm tracks.Impacts onPhysicalEnvironmentDroughts(Section 3.5.1)Medium confidence that some regions <strong>of</strong> the worldhave experienced more intense and longer droughts,in particular in southern Europe and West Africa, butopposite trends also exist. [Regional details in Table3-2]Medium confidence thatanthropogenic influence hascontributed to some observedchanges in drought patterns.Low confidence in attribution <strong>of</strong>changes in drought at the level <strong>of</strong>single regions due to inconsistentor insufficient evidence.Medium confidence in projected increase in durationand intensity <strong>of</strong> droughts in some regions <strong>of</strong> theworld, including southern Europe and theMediterranean region, central Europe, central NorthAmerica, Central America and Mexico, northeastBrazil, and southern Africa.Overall low confidence elsewhere because <strong>of</strong>insufficient agreement <strong>of</strong> projections.[Regional details in Table 3-3]Floods(Section 3.5.2)Limited to medium evidence available to assessclimate-driven observed changes in the magnitudeand frequency <strong>of</strong> floods at regional scale.Furthermore, there is low agreement in this evidence,and thus overall low confidence at the global scaleregarding even the sign <strong>of</strong> these changes.High confidence in trend toward earlier occurrence <strong>of</strong>spring peak river flows in snowmelt- and glacier-fedrivers.Low confidence that anthropogenicwarming has affected themagnitude or frequency <strong>of</strong> floods ata global scale.Medium confidence to highconfidence in anthropogenicinfluence on changes in somecomponents <strong>of</strong> the water cycle(precipitation, snowmelt) affectingfloods.Low confidence in global projections <strong>of</strong> changes inflood magnitude and frequency because <strong>of</strong> insufficientevidence.Medium confidence (based on physical reasoning)that projected increases in heavy precipitation wouldcontribute to rain-generated local flooding in somecatchments or regions.Very likely earlier spring peak flows in snowmelt- andglacier-fed rivers.Continued next page119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!