10.07.2015 Views

IPCC_Managing Risks of Extreme Events.pdf - Climate Access

IPCC_Managing Risks of Extreme Events.pdf - Climate Access

IPCC_Managing Risks of Extreme Events.pdf - Climate Access

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<strong>Managing</strong> the <strong>Risks</strong> from <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Extreme</strong>s at the Local LevelBox 5-6 | Race, Class, Age, and Gender: Hurricane Katrina Recovery and ReconstructionThe intersection <strong>of</strong> race, class, age, and gender influenced differential decisionmaking; the uneven distribution <strong>of</strong> vulnerability andexposure; and variable access to post-event aid, recovery, and reconstruction in New Orleans before, during, and after Hurricane Katrina(Elliott and Pais, 2006; Hartman and Squires, 2006; Tierney, 2006). Evacuation can protect people from injury and death, but there areinequalities in who can evacuate and when, with the elderly, poor, and minority residents least able to leave without assistance (Cutterand Smith, 2009). Extended evacuations (or temporary displacements lasting weeks to months) produce negative effects. Prolongedperiods <strong>of</strong> evacuation can result in a number <strong>of</strong> physical and mental health problems (Curtis et al., 2007; Mills et al., 2007). Furthermore,separation from family and community members and not knowing when a return home will be possible also adds to stress among evacuees(Curtis et al., 2007). DeSalvo et al. (2007) found that long periods <strong>of</strong> displacement were among the key causes <strong>of</strong> post-traumatic stressdisorder in a study <strong>of</strong> New Orleans workers. These temporary displacements can also lead to permanent outmigration by specific socialgroups as shown by the depopulation <strong>of</strong> New Orleans five years after Hurricane Katrina (Myers et al., 2008). In terms <strong>of</strong> longer-termrecovery, New Orleans is progressing, however large losses in population, housing, and employment suggest a pattern <strong>of</strong> only partialrecovery for the city with significant differences in the location and the timing at the neighborhood or community level (Finch et al., 2010).how natural resource-dependent people cope with climate change inthe context <strong>of</strong> wider livelihood influences is critical to formulating validadaptation frameworks.Local people’s livelihoods and their access to and control <strong>of</strong> resourcescan be affected by events largely beyond their control such as climaticextremes (e.g., floods, droughts), conflict, or agricultural problems suchas pests and disease and economic shocks that can largely impact theirlivelihoods (Chambers and Conway, 1992; Jones et al., 2010). For poorcommunities living on fragile and degraded lands such as steep hillsides,dry lands, and floodplains, climate extremes present additional threatsto their livelihoods that could be lost completely if exposed to repeateddisastrous events within short intervals leaving insufficient time forrecovery. Actions aiming at improving local adaptive capacity focusmore on addressing the deteriorating environmental conditions. Acentral element in their adaptation strategies involves ecosystemmanagement and restoration activities such as watershed rehabilitation,agroecology, and forest landscape restoration (Ellis, 2000; Ellis andAllison, 2004; Osman-Elasha, 2006b). As some suggest (Spanger-Siegfriedet al., 2005) these types <strong>of</strong> interventions <strong>of</strong>ten protect and enhancenatural resources at the local scale and address immediate developmentpriorities, but can also improve local capacities to adapt to futureclimate change. The buffering capacities <strong>of</strong> local people’s livelihoodsand their institutions are critical for their adaptation to extreme climatestress. They <strong>of</strong>ten rest on the ability <strong>of</strong> communities to generatepotentials for self-organization and for social learning and innovations(Adger et al., 2006).A number <strong>of</strong> studies indicated that sustainable strategies for disasterreduction help improve livelihoods (UNISDR, 2004), while social capitaland community networks support adaptation and disaster risk reductionby diminishing the need for emergency relief in times <strong>of</strong> droughtand/or crop failure (Devereux and Coll-Black, 2007; see Section 5.2.1).A research study in South Asia suggests that adaptive capacity andlivelihood resilience depend on social capital at the household level (i.e.,education and other factors that enable individuals to function within awider economy), the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> local enabling institutions(local cooperatives, banks, self-help groups), and the larger physical andsocial infrastructure that enables goods, information, services, and peopleto flow. Interventions to catalyze effective adaptation are important atall these multiple levels (Moench and Dixit, 2004). Diversification withinand beyond agriculture is a widely recognized strategy for reducing riskand increasing well-being in many developing countries (Ellis, 2000;Ellis and Allison, 2004).Entitlements are assets <strong>of</strong> the individuals and household. Assets arebroadly defined and include not only physical assets such as land, butalso human capital such as education and training. At the local scaleassets include institutional assets such as technical assistance or credit;social capital such as mutual assistance networks; public assets such asbasic infrastructure like water and sanitation; and environmental assetssuch as access to resources and ownership <strong>of</strong> them (Leach et al., 1999).The link between disaster risk, access to resources, and adaptation hasbeen widely documented in the literature (Sen, 1981; Adger, 2000;Brooks, 2003). <strong>Extreme</strong> climate events generally lead to entitlementdecline in terms <strong>of</strong> the rights and opportunities that local people haveto access and command the livelihood resources that enable them todeal with and adapt to climate stress.Assessment <strong>of</strong> livelihoods provides the explanation as to the differencesin responses based on the understanding <strong>of</strong> endowments, entitlements,and capabilities, within the organizational structure and power relations<strong>of</strong> individuals, households, communities, and other local entities (Scoones,1998). <strong>Access</strong> to assets and entitlements is an important element inimproving the ability <strong>of</strong> localities to lessen their vulnerability and tocope with and respond to disasters and environmental change. In someinstances, this may not be true. For example, if a disaster affects ahousehold asset, but the household is still paying <strong>of</strong>f its debt regardingthe initial cost <strong>of</strong> the asset and assuming that the asset is not protectedor insured against hazards, the asset loss coupled with the need to pay <strong>of</strong>fthe loan renders the household more vulnerable, not less (Twigg, 2001).Entitlement protection thus requires adaptive types <strong>of</strong> institutions and315

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!