22.11.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Crowd Control: Boxing in Weimar Germany<br />

Here, Rumpelstilzchen contradicted some of his earlier comments from the 1921<br />

article regarding women, boxing and “delicate sensitivities.” Instead, he argued<br />

against women attending boxing matches not because it would offend their<br />

natures, but precisely the opposite – because it would arouse their natures and<br />

appeal to their basest desires. Contrary to the standard assumption that women<br />

would reject boxing after witnessing its true nature, the article feared that women<br />

would embrace it.<br />

Other commentators also saw something in the female nature that drew women<br />

to the violent aspects of the sport. In a 1928 article in Sport und Sonne, boxing<br />

elicited the repressed, violence-loving side of its female spectators. Just as in the<br />

short story “Inge und der Boxkampf,” the article invoked the bestial image of a<br />

bull fight:<br />

The women . . . Honor the women . . . but not at a boxing match. There the superwoman<br />

steels her gaze; nature reveals itself as cruel, cold and lascivious . . . ‘Oh God, Hans, look,<br />

he’s bleeding!!’ I look at [the woman who just said that] . . . I suspect that this woman<br />

has only one regret: that we still do not have bullfights here. 82<br />

The woman described in this article wore an expensive fur and the latest fashions<br />

and clearly came from the upper class. Interestingly, reports generally characterized<br />

the women who attended fights as middle or upper class, whereas many<br />

of these same reports continued to portray the majority of the male spectators as<br />

working or lower-middle class. Commentators who decried male behavior at<br />

boxing matches attributed it primarily to the crowd’s working-class origins.<br />

Descriptions of improper female spectatorship, however, attributed it to the nature<br />

of women themselves.<br />

Due to the inhibitions and superstitions surrounding women’s attendance and<br />

to the fear that the physical aggressiveness of the sport would either upset or arouse<br />

them, boxing associations in the 1920s often sought to restrict women’s presence<br />

at fights. During a meeting of the Boxsport-Behörde Deutschlands (German<br />

Boxing Authority) in 1927, the council reminded officials not to seat women<br />

ringside at any fights. 83 The minutes mentioned no specific reason for this<br />

reassertion of existing policy, but it probably aimed both at safeguarding boxing<br />

from the presumed deleterious effect of women on the performances of the<br />

fighters, and at protecting the sensibilities of women from the violent scenes visible<br />

at such close proximity to the ring.<br />

A very few boxing commentators, however, took the opposite stance. Rather<br />

than seeking to restrict women’s access to boxing matches, they sought to increase<br />

it. Erwin Petzall, in his analysis of women at the fights, pushed for greater female<br />

attendance, arguing that this would encourage better behavior on the part of the<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!