22.11.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stephen Gundle<br />

In the 1930s, Neal Gabler has shown, Hollywood fictions entered the mainstream;<br />

what had been a vision of the United States shaped by newcomers and<br />

outsiders became the mythology of urban America. 7 As Americanism became<br />

inseparable from consumerism, glamour defined mentalities, behavior, aspirations<br />

and patterns of consumption, as well as ideals of beauty and so on. 8 Moreover,<br />

from being the lingua franca of a melting pot, it became in the 1940s a powerful<br />

tool of American war morale and self-perception as well as a weapon in the United<br />

States’ armoury against its enemies. The independent producer Walter Wanger<br />

probably exaggerated in 1945 when he argued that the United States won the war<br />

because it had Tyrone Power and Lana Turner on its side whereas its enemies had<br />

only political figures, but the alignment of glamour and power was a seductive<br />

one that would serve the United States well in its efforts to persuade Europeans of<br />

its virtues and guide them towards a new model of modernization. 9<br />

Hollywood glamour was a potent force in Europe in the 1940s. People were<br />

dazzled by the beauty and sex appeal of the stars and delighted in the dreamworld<br />

of prosperity and luxury which they inhabited. But there were filters and factors<br />

which meant that Hollywood glamour was never accepted en bloc. Royalty and<br />

aristocracy, for example, occupied an important part of the space of glamour,<br />

cultivating sensations of loyalty and deference rather than dynamic emulation.<br />

Moreover many of the premises of the development of American glamour, like<br />

national retail networks, department stores, modern advertising, pronounced<br />

individualism etc., were absent. There were also domestic traditions of the<br />

representation of the desirable and the sexually alluring which reflected the class<br />

structure. Hollywood had the advantage of having incorporated some of these, but<br />

its industrial model of glamour was often too big, too commercial, too artificial to<br />

sustain simply and positively the conversion of whole societies to new ways of<br />

thinking and behaving. Moreover, part of the intention of the European Recovery<br />

Program (ERP) and in US postwar policy was to stimulate European societies to<br />

develop their own mythologies of capitalism that would cut across, and ultimately<br />

displace, political ideologies.<br />

It is in the light of these considerations that the case of postwar Italy needs to<br />

be examined.<br />

American Glamour and Postwar Italy<br />

Hollywood glamour arrived in postwar Italy through two means: filmic representations<br />

and magazine and newsreel images of American stars in the peninsula. By<br />

no means all US films were glamorous; the first to be shown, selected by the Allied<br />

Forces’ Psychological Warfare Branch, were largely propaganda films justifying<br />

the American war effort or, like Chaplin’s The Great Dictator, satirizing Fascist<br />

340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!