22.11.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Christopher S. Thompson<br />

elaborated a discourse of social distinction that contrasted the elegant ideal of the<br />

bicycling gentleman with his uncouth, working-class opposite. By the turn of the<br />

century, how one cycled, that is, one’s behavior, posture, position, and attire on<br />

the bicycle, had become an important social marker.<br />

Meanwhile, the republican regime, anxious to mend its relations with the<br />

increasingly visible, self-confident, and organized lower classes, sought to channel<br />

the latter’s growing interest in cycling into activities and institutions – specifically,<br />

cycling clubs – that would instill in them republican civic values and bourgeois<br />

respectability. Battles over the social meaning and potential of the bicycle in finde-siècle<br />

France were thus intimately linked to class identities, class relationships,<br />

the rise of mass leisure, and a new consumer culture of plentiful and relatively<br />

inexpensive goods symbolized by the bicycle.<br />

There is, of course, considerable scholarship on the social question, class<br />

formation, and class relations in nineteenth-century France. The focus of this<br />

scholarship has been essentially – and for good reason – on illuminating class<br />

identities, experiences, and relations through the dual prism of politics and work.<br />

Leisure – sport, in particular – has, however, until recently been relatively<br />

neglected. Yet for male workers broadly defined and for the young men filling the<br />

growing number of petty white-collar positions in commercial and government<br />

bureaucracies, the development of new leisure opportunities, especially new<br />

sporting activities such as bicycling, represented a significant improvement in their<br />

lives. The fact that these were leisure activities instead of work or politics did not<br />

of course render them politically or socially neutral; on the contrary, such activities<br />

and the organizations they spawned provided a new terrain, at the intersection of<br />

politics, civil society, and consumer culture, for the conceptualizing and playing<br />

out of class identities and relationships during the Belle Epoque. I have addressed<br />

elsewhere the case of female cycling in the Belle Epoque, specifically debates<br />

about the emancipation of bourgeois women by the bicycle; 3 here I shall focus on<br />

the ways in which contemporary perceptions of class and of political and economic<br />

interests both informed and were shaped by the realities and representations of<br />

male bicycling.<br />

The Bourgeois Cavalier Cycliste versus the Working-Class Vélocipédard<br />

Prior to the 1890s the bicycle’s cost made it the virtually exclusive toy of the wellto-do;<br />

even so, bicycling faced elitists who dismissed the new sport because it was<br />

neither noble like fencing and riding, which, they noted, went back to the<br />

Crusades, nor well established like boating, gymnastics, foot races, and hunting. 4<br />

As late as 1894, one defender of the bicycle noted the “disdain and pity,” the “easy<br />

sarcasm” with which “fanatics of the horse of flesh” had until recently viewed the<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!