27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />

regulative framework, one that deals with the level of h<strong>in</strong>drance that a bridge is<br />

allowed to cause ships <strong>in</strong> a canal, river or harbour.<br />

I will start with a discussion of some aspects of the regulative framework<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g safety dur<strong>in</strong>g construction. Dutch legislation on work<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />

is an implementation of European directives 89/391/EC (health <strong>and</strong> safety at<br />

work <strong>in</strong> general) <strong>and</strong> 92/57/EC (health <strong>and</strong> safety on construction sites). The law<br />

on work<strong>in</strong>g conditions is very general <strong>and</strong> only states goals, <strong>for</strong> example that an<br />

employee should not be put at risk. However, the law is supplemented with<br />

several policy rules, rules on f<strong>in</strong>es <strong>for</strong> breaches of safety regulation, rules <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>spection of work<strong>in</strong>g conditions etc. All these rules are much more detailed <strong>and</strong><br />

are supplemented by ideas on how to <strong>in</strong>terpret the rules, law etc [Wilders, 2004].<br />

The complete Dutch work<strong>in</strong>g conditions regulation system constitutes a<br />

regulative framework.<br />

The IBA eng<strong>in</strong>eers only used part of this regulative framework, they only<br />

made the required health <strong>and</strong> safety plan. The rest of the regulative framework,<br />

such as the more detailed rules, was not considered by the eng<strong>in</strong>eers. The IBA<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers only carried out the requirement to make a health <strong>and</strong> safety plan<br />

because they considered the rest outside the scope of eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>. The<br />

law also assigns only this specific responsibility to the <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>eers. The<br />

complete regulative framework is relevant <strong>for</strong> contractors not <strong>for</strong> <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers accord<strong>in</strong>g to the IBA eng<strong>in</strong>eers.<br />

I will not go <strong>in</strong>to the question of whether or not the regulative framework<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g conditions is a normative framework. I conclude that the<br />

regulative framework was not used by eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>in</strong> this case. Eng<strong>in</strong>eers have a<br />

task assigned to them by the regulative framework but because the task is<br />

limited <strong>and</strong> procedural they can per<strong>for</strong>m this task without us<strong>in</strong>g the rest of the<br />

framework. If a health <strong>and</strong> safety plan made by <strong>design</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers does not<br />

contribute to better work<strong>in</strong>g conditions on a build<strong>in</strong>g site then it might be a good<br />

idea to assign more substantial responsibilities to the <strong>design</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g conditions. This would <strong>for</strong>ce the eng<strong>in</strong>eers to use the<br />

regulative framework concern<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g conditions.<br />

There is also a regulative framework <strong>for</strong> road <strong>design</strong>. This regulative<br />

framework requires, amongst other th<strong>in</strong>gs, m<strong>in</strong>imum widths of roads. The<br />

requirements from the road <strong>design</strong> framework are decisive <strong>for</strong> the width of a<br />

bridge. So although the eng<strong>in</strong>eers did not work with<strong>in</strong> the road <strong>design</strong> regulative<br />

framework their work was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by some of its rules. With regard to the<br />

possible regulative framework concern<strong>in</strong>g h<strong>in</strong>drance of ships on canals, rivers<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> harbours, the same holds. The IBA eng<strong>in</strong>eers only knew some of the<br />

rules <strong>and</strong> just sent their <strong>design</strong> to the Rijkswaterstaat to be controlled. The IBA<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers there<strong>for</strong>e did not use all of the rules or legislation concern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!