27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />

Bridge Assumption: <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

by legislation <strong>and</strong> codes<br />

leads to safe bridges.<br />

166<br />

Choice between<br />

European code <strong>and</strong> NEN<br />

code.<br />

A choice between types<br />

of codes <strong>for</strong> certa<strong>in</strong><br />

specific parts of the<br />

bridge.<br />

What should the health<br />

<strong>and</strong> safety plan look like,<br />

should the eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

change the <strong>design</strong> to<br />

prevent risks dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

construction?<br />

What misuse should be<br />

prevented <strong>and</strong> how?<br />

Operationalisation<br />

I of requirements<br />

Operationalisation<br />

I of requirements<br />

Operationalisation<br />

I of structural<br />

requirements<br />

Operationalisation<br />

II of requirement<br />

to make a health<br />

<strong>and</strong> safety plan<br />

Operationalisation<br />

II of safety<br />

Regulative framework<br />

available no signs of not<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g accepted, some<br />

ambiguities, not<br />

pragmatically complete.<br />

Temporarily ambiguity <strong>in</strong><br />

regulative framework.<br />

Inconsistency <strong>in</strong> the<br />

regulative framework.<br />

Work with complete health<br />

<strong>and</strong> safety regulative<br />

framework dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

construction or not.<br />

Regulative framework does<br />

not <strong>in</strong>clude rules about<br />

prevention of misuse of<br />

bridges, there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>complete.<br />

The regulative frameworks used <strong>in</strong> the case-studies do not meet Grunwald’s<br />

requirements but they can provide ways of deal<strong>in</strong>g with problems of ambiguity,<br />

<strong>in</strong>consistency <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>completeness. It might there<strong>for</strong>e be possible to make<br />

regulative frameworks more pragmatically complete, locally consistent <strong>and</strong><br />

unambiguous by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a few new elements.<br />

Some problems of ambiguity <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>consistency can be dealt with with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

regulative frameworks. Regulative frameworks are hierarchical; not all elements<br />

carry the same weight. Legislation is at a higher level than codes <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

Sometimes the framework provides ways of solv<strong>in</strong>g conflicts between elements,<br />

by mak<strong>in</strong>g it possible to use an element at a higher level to solve the conflict. The<br />

regulative framework can be <strong>for</strong>mulated <strong>in</strong> a way that leaves eng<strong>in</strong>eers with the<br />

freedom to not follow detailed prescriptive rules <strong>in</strong> exceptional cases. This<br />

possibility is available <strong>in</strong> most exist<strong>in</strong>g regulative frameworks because the<br />

detailed prescriptive elements like codes are not legally en<strong>for</strong>ced. When<br />

<strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g, eng<strong>in</strong>eers together with the customer <strong>and</strong> certify<strong>in</strong>g organisations<br />

can decide not to use codes <strong>in</strong>stead they can choose to use an alternative way to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!