27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />

regulative framework. Company specific norms <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards can there<strong>for</strong>e only<br />

impose stricter requirements than the regulative framework.<br />

The notion of a regulative framework differs from notions like technological<br />

regime or technological paradigm <strong>in</strong> that the regulative framework <strong>in</strong>cludes only<br />

<strong>for</strong>mal norms, rules <strong>and</strong> their <strong>in</strong>terpretations that perta<strong>in</strong> to the <strong>design</strong>,<br />

certification <strong>and</strong> construction of a product. Technological regimes are def<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

Rip <strong>and</strong> Kemp as:<br />

36<br />

‘the rule-set or grammar embedded <strong>in</strong> a complex of eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices, production process technologies, product characteristics, skills<br />

<strong>and</strong> procedures, ways of h<strong>and</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g relevant artefacts <strong>and</strong> persons, ways of<br />

def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g problems- all of them imbedded <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructures.’ [Rip <strong>and</strong> Kemp, 1998, 338]<br />

A technological regime def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this way <strong>in</strong>cludes much more than the<br />

regulative framework as it also <strong>in</strong>cludes skills <strong>and</strong> ways of h<strong>and</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g artefacts <strong>and</strong><br />

persons. Other authors have used other def<strong>in</strong>itions of technological regimes. Van<br />

de Poel <strong>for</strong> example focuses on def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g technological regimes <strong>for</strong> <strong>design</strong><br />

processes. Although Van de Poel restricts his def<strong>in</strong>ition of technological regimes<br />

to technical regimes <strong>for</strong> <strong>design</strong> processes, he <strong>in</strong>cludes more <strong>in</strong> a technical regime<br />

<strong>for</strong> the <strong>design</strong> of a product than is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> a regulative framework, such as<br />

promises <strong>and</strong> expectations of a product [Van de Poel, 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000a].<br />

2.3.2 Normative frameworks<br />

The idea of normal <strong>design</strong> can be related to Grunwald’s idea that <strong>in</strong> ‘bus<strong>in</strong>ess-asusual’<br />

technology development there is no need <strong>for</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers to reflect ethically<br />

[Grunwald, 2001]. Grunwald suggests that there are situations <strong>in</strong> which an<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer should ethically reflect on the development of technology <strong>and</strong> that there<br />

are situations which he classifies as bus<strong>in</strong>ess-as-usual <strong>in</strong> which there is no such<br />

need <strong>for</strong> ethical reflection ([Grunwald, 2000] <strong>and</strong> [Grunwald, 2001]). Grunwald<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>in</strong> “bus<strong>in</strong>ess-as-usual” a normative framework exists that governs<br />

all ethically relevant decisions that are made dur<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>design</strong> process. He th<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

that a lot, if not most, decisions <strong>in</strong> technology development are covered by<br />

normative frameworks. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Grunwald eng<strong>in</strong>eers have to apply the rules<br />

from the normative framework without further ethical reflection if this normative<br />

framework meets the follow<strong>in</strong>g requirements: 8<br />

——————————————————————————————————<br />

8 Grunwald does not explicitly state that eng<strong>in</strong>eers have an obligation to use the normative<br />

framework but the requirement “observed” seems to imply this. In an article from 2005,<br />

Grunwald has changed the requirement of observed to ‘compliance: the normative framework<br />

also has to be complied with <strong>in</strong> the field concerned.’ [Grunwald, 2005, 189].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!