Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />
There are also load scenarios <strong>for</strong> strength calculations <strong>for</strong> the more extreme<br />
situations that might occur, such as a fully loaded trailer driv<strong>in</strong>g too fast over a<br />
pothole.<br />
In this <strong>design</strong> process the load scenarios were not known. Liz had experience<br />
with <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g trailers but this was her first assignment to <strong>design</strong> a trailer<br />
without a roof that could be loaded with s<strong>and</strong>. The eng<strong>in</strong>eers did not know how<br />
the s<strong>and</strong> would behave when the trailer turned a corner. The s<strong>and</strong> might, <strong>for</strong><br />
example, shift <strong>and</strong> push, with its total mass beh<strong>in</strong>d it aga<strong>in</strong>st the side panels. The<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eers could refer to previous projects <strong>for</strong> some load scenarios, but at the start<br />
of the <strong>design</strong> project Liz <strong>and</strong> Hans tried to reason out what the loads would be<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g educated guesses <strong>and</strong> an aerospace eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g method.<br />
An example of an educated guess is that Liz thought that the torsional<br />
stiffness of the trailer should be somewhat higher than that of an exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer. At the time of the <strong>design</strong> period there were problems with<br />
alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailers, with the welds used to connect the side panels to the front<br />
panel. Fractures <strong>in</strong> these structures were probably be<strong>in</strong>g caused by movement<br />
<strong>and</strong> displacement of the side panels caus<strong>in</strong>g extreme stresses <strong>in</strong> the welds. A<br />
more torsional stiff trailer or a more flexible connection between the front <strong>and</strong><br />
side panels would solve this problem.<br />
The aerospace eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g method <strong>in</strong>cluded the follow<strong>in</strong>g ideas: calculations<br />
were done us<strong>in</strong>g limit <strong>and</strong> ultimate load. In aerospace eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g limit load is a<br />
load that the structure will experience with a certa<strong>in</strong> chance dur<strong>in</strong>g its lifetime. A<br />
limit load may lead to some elastic de<strong>for</strong>mation but never to permanent damage.<br />
An ultimate load scenario was used <strong>for</strong> strength calculations. An ultimate load is<br />
a load that may damage a plane <strong>and</strong> lead to permanent (plastic) de<strong>for</strong>mation but<br />
will still allow the plane to l<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> reasonable safety. As a <strong>design</strong> rule the ultimate<br />
load is 1.5 times the limit load. This 1.5 is called the safety factor.<br />
This aerospace eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g method was comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a dynamic factor<br />
common <strong>in</strong> automotive eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. This dynamic factor was used to account <strong>for</strong><br />
extra <strong>for</strong>ces on the trailer, when <strong>for</strong> example, a pothole is encountered. This<br />
dynamic factor was 2. 6 The ultimate load was then 3g (1,5*2g) times the mass of<br />
the cargo <strong>in</strong> which g is the gravitational constant. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Liz, trailer<br />
producers use a total factor of 3, as established <strong>for</strong> a previous trailer project.<br />
All calculations were done us<strong>in</strong>g a maximum mass of 32 tonnes of s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> a<br />
maximum mass of 9 tonnes on the axles. This maximum load <strong>for</strong> the s<strong>and</strong> was<br />
calculated tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the allowed maximum total mass of 44 tonnes <strong>for</strong><br />
a truck, trailer <strong>and</strong> load comb<strong>in</strong>ation. The trailer will have a mass of about 5.5<br />
——————————————————————————————————<br />
6 It is <strong>in</strong>deed mentioned <strong>in</strong> a h<strong>and</strong>book that a dynamic factor to account <strong>for</strong> rough roads should<br />
be <strong>in</strong>cluded but there a factor of 3 is proposed [Fenton, 1996 , 44].<br />
136