27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />

After the <strong>in</strong>terview <strong>and</strong> observation periods I gave a presentation of my<br />

results to each of the <strong>design</strong> teams. This presentation was followed by a<br />

discussion. Eng<strong>in</strong>eers could <strong>in</strong>dicate whether I had made some <strong>in</strong>correct factual<br />

statements about the <strong>design</strong> process <strong>and</strong> whether or not they recognised the<br />

results. The presentation was also a last opportunity <strong>for</strong> me to ask about some<br />

details that were not yet clear to me. The reason <strong>for</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g a presentation at the<br />

end of the observation <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g period was that the eng<strong>in</strong>eers were<br />

curious about, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong>, my research <strong>and</strong> results. If eng<strong>in</strong>eers asked me<br />

about the results, I told them that I would present my results, <strong>and</strong> give them the<br />

opportunity to react to these results, later on. This gave me the opportunity to<br />

postpone discussions on safety <strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability until the presentation <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to <strong>in</strong>fluence the <strong>design</strong> process as little as possible.<br />

I have chosen to change the names of the participat<strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>in</strong> the<br />

descriptions of the <strong>design</strong> processes The eng<strong>in</strong>eers did not ask me to do this but<br />

I have chosen to protect their privacy <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> text, see appendix 1 <strong>for</strong> more<br />

concrete <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation. The exact identity of the persons <strong>in</strong>volved does not matter<br />

<strong>for</strong> the case descriptions, his or her arguments, decisions <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal position <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>design</strong> team are relevant <strong>for</strong> this thesis.<br />

In do<strong>in</strong>g the case-studies, I made the choice to present myself as an eng<strong>in</strong>eer<br />

among eng<strong>in</strong>eers. A large advantage of this choice was that the <strong>design</strong> team<br />

members knew that I could underst<strong>and</strong> the “language” of eng<strong>in</strong>eers; <strong>and</strong><br />

although my participation was kept to a m<strong>in</strong>imum dur<strong>in</strong>g the observation <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terview period, the members of the <strong>design</strong> teams knew that I was a qualified<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer; this made communication easier. The <strong>design</strong> team members did not<br />

feel compelled to expla<strong>in</strong> everyth<strong>in</strong>g they were do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a simplified way.<br />

In l<strong>in</strong>e with keep<strong>in</strong>g my participation at a m<strong>in</strong>imum, I did not contribute to<br />

the solution of the <strong>design</strong> problem. This choice was also made because<br />

participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a <strong>design</strong> process would require a lot from me as I had no<br />

previous <strong>design</strong> experience. The <strong>design</strong> task would probably completely absorb<br />

my attention <strong>and</strong> time, mak<strong>in</strong>g it difficult also to observe what was go<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>in</strong><br />

the team. There<strong>for</strong>e, I was <strong>in</strong>volved but not as a member of the <strong>design</strong> team. I<br />

had some <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong> the <strong>design</strong> process at the end of the data gather<strong>in</strong>g period<br />

when I presented my results.<br />

With regard to the validity of my results, I tried to m<strong>in</strong>imise the <strong>in</strong>fluence of<br />

my presence. I did this by <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that I was <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> ethical <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>design</strong> processes without a thorough explanation of what I meant by the term<br />

“ethical <strong>issues</strong>”. Roughly, eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>in</strong> the cases <strong>in</strong>terpreted the term “ethical<br />

<strong>issues</strong>” <strong>in</strong> four different ways. First, some eng<strong>in</strong>eers thought that I wanted to look<br />

at human rights <strong>and</strong> wondered what I was do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their company because they<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!