27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 8.1: Summary of the DutchEVO case-study.<br />

Radical, high level <strong>design</strong><br />

<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong><br />

questions <strong>and</strong><br />

problems<br />

Driver should feel<br />

vulnerable, <strong>design</strong><br />

team chooses not<br />

to <strong>in</strong>clude all k<strong>in</strong>ds<br />

of safety systems.<br />

A light car always<br />

has a disadvantage<br />

<strong>in</strong> a collision with<br />

a heavier car but it<br />

is more<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able.<br />

It is not possible to<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude all exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

passive <strong>and</strong> active<br />

safety systems <strong>in</strong> a<br />

light car.<br />

A susta<strong>in</strong>able car<br />

is a very light car.<br />

A susta<strong>in</strong>able car<br />

is a lightweight car<br />

even if it is<br />

difficult to recycle<br />

The DutchEVO<br />

should be<br />

emotionally<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able.<br />

K<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>issues</strong> Solution <strong>and</strong><br />

decision approaches<br />

Operationalisation II of<br />

safety<br />

Trade-offs between safety<br />

<strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

Trade-offs between safety<br />

<strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

Operationalisation II of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

Operationalisation II of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />

Operationalisation II of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability, friction<br />

with other parts of<br />

operationalisation of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />

Conclusions of the empirical study<br />

Rejection of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regulative framework<br />

based on personal<br />

experience. This<br />

became an <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

<strong>design</strong> team norm.<br />

Some limited<br />

literature research.<br />

Personal <strong>and</strong> <strong>design</strong><br />

experience.<br />

Discussions,<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

<strong>design</strong> team norm.<br />

Literature research,<br />

discussions, ideas on<br />

recycl<strong>in</strong>g from PhD<br />

students on recycl<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

<strong>design</strong> team norm.<br />

Emotional<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability is based<br />

on literature about<br />

<strong>design</strong> <strong>and</strong> personal<br />

experience. Fun-todrive<br />

became an<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>design</strong> team<br />

norm.<br />

Decision<br />

makers<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!