Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 8.1: Summary of the DutchEVO case-study.<br />
Radical, high level <strong>design</strong><br />
<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong><br />
questions <strong>and</strong><br />
problems<br />
Driver should feel<br />
vulnerable, <strong>design</strong><br />
team chooses not<br />
to <strong>in</strong>clude all k<strong>in</strong>ds<br />
of safety systems.<br />
A light car always<br />
has a disadvantage<br />
<strong>in</strong> a collision with<br />
a heavier car but it<br />
is more<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able.<br />
It is not possible to<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude all exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
passive <strong>and</strong> active<br />
safety systems <strong>in</strong> a<br />
light car.<br />
A susta<strong>in</strong>able car<br />
is a very light car.<br />
A susta<strong>in</strong>able car<br />
is a lightweight car<br />
even if it is<br />
difficult to recycle<br />
The DutchEVO<br />
should be<br />
emotionally<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>issues</strong> Solution <strong>and</strong><br />
decision approaches<br />
Operationalisation II of<br />
safety<br />
Trade-offs between safety<br />
<strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
Trade-offs between safety<br />
<strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
Operationalisation II of<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
Operationalisation II of<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
Operationalisation II of<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability, friction<br />
with other parts of<br />
operationalisation of<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />
Conclusions of the empirical study<br />
Rejection of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regulative framework<br />
based on personal<br />
experience. This<br />
became an <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
<strong>design</strong> team norm.<br />
Some limited<br />
literature research.<br />
Personal <strong>and</strong> <strong>design</strong><br />
experience.<br />
Discussions,<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
<strong>design</strong> team norm.<br />
Literature research,<br />
discussions, ideas on<br />
recycl<strong>in</strong>g from PhD<br />
students on recycl<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
<strong>design</strong> team norm.<br />
Emotional<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability is based<br />
on literature about<br />
<strong>design</strong> <strong>and</strong> personal<br />
experience. Fun-todrive<br />
became an<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>design</strong> team<br />
norm.<br />
Decision<br />
makers<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
155