Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conclusions of the empirical study<br />
It can be concluded from the conceptual <strong>and</strong> empirical considerations discussed<br />
above that <strong>in</strong> general the way that eng<strong>in</strong>eers deal with ethical <strong>issues</strong> depends on<br />
the <strong>design</strong> type. In normal <strong>design</strong> a regulative framework will usually be<br />
available to provide operationalisations of requirements <strong>and</strong> gives some<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es as to what trade-offs are legally allowed. This regulative framework<br />
will be used to decide on ethical <strong>issues</strong>. In radical <strong>design</strong> the regulative<br />
framework will not be or only partly be used to make decisions on ethical <strong>issues</strong>.<br />
Hypothesis 2b: the regulative framework fulfils all Grunwald’s requirements <strong>and</strong><br />
is there<strong>for</strong>e a normative framework, is not supported by the empirical evidence.<br />
In this research at least three commonly used regulative frameworks, those <strong>for</strong><br />
the construction of bridges, of pip<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> equipment <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> car <strong>design</strong>, did not<br />
meet Grunwald’s requirements. Generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, the follow<strong>in</strong>g problems<br />
may be expected <strong>in</strong> regulative frameworks.<br />
(1) There will be a problem concern<strong>in</strong>g acceptance; it is not easy to establish<br />
whether all the affected actors accept the regulative framework.<br />
(2) EU directives under the New Approach are <strong>for</strong>mulated <strong>in</strong> a goal-oriented<br />
manner <strong>for</strong> product groups [www.newapproach.org]. When def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
regulations <strong>for</strong> product groups <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>for</strong> specific products, it may be<br />
necessary to be a bit vague <strong>and</strong> ambiguous. This vagueness <strong>and</strong> ambiguity<br />
can be used to help make the directive applicable <strong>for</strong> a broad range of<br />
products. So it is very likely that there will always be some ambiguity <strong>in</strong><br />
regulative frameworks based on EU directives.<br />
(3) Regulative frameworks usually leave decisions to be made by the <strong>design</strong><br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>and</strong> are there<strong>for</strong>e not pragmatically complete. It is impossible to<br />
prescribe every little detail of a <strong>design</strong> even if this was the idea beh<strong>in</strong>d the EU<br />
directives.<br />
On these grounds it can be expected that <strong>in</strong> general, although a regulative<br />
framework will be available <strong>for</strong> normal <strong>design</strong>s, such a framework will probably<br />
not meet Grunwald’s requirements.<br />
173