27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions of the empirical study<br />

It can be concluded from the conceptual <strong>and</strong> empirical considerations discussed<br />

above that <strong>in</strong> general the way that eng<strong>in</strong>eers deal with ethical <strong>issues</strong> depends on<br />

the <strong>design</strong> type. In normal <strong>design</strong> a regulative framework will usually be<br />

available to provide operationalisations of requirements <strong>and</strong> gives some<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es as to what trade-offs are legally allowed. This regulative framework<br />

will be used to decide on ethical <strong>issues</strong>. In radical <strong>design</strong> the regulative<br />

framework will not be or only partly be used to make decisions on ethical <strong>issues</strong>.<br />

Hypothesis 2b: the regulative framework fulfils all Grunwald’s requirements <strong>and</strong><br />

is there<strong>for</strong>e a normative framework, is not supported by the empirical evidence.<br />

In this research at least three commonly used regulative frameworks, those <strong>for</strong><br />

the construction of bridges, of pip<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> equipment <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> car <strong>design</strong>, did not<br />

meet Grunwald’s requirements. Generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, the follow<strong>in</strong>g problems<br />

may be expected <strong>in</strong> regulative frameworks.<br />

(1) There will be a problem concern<strong>in</strong>g acceptance; it is not easy to establish<br />

whether all the affected actors accept the regulative framework.<br />

(2) EU directives under the New Approach are <strong>for</strong>mulated <strong>in</strong> a goal-oriented<br />

manner <strong>for</strong> product groups [www.newapproach.org]. When def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

regulations <strong>for</strong> product groups <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>for</strong> specific products, it may be<br />

necessary to be a bit vague <strong>and</strong> ambiguous. This vagueness <strong>and</strong> ambiguity<br />

can be used to help make the directive applicable <strong>for</strong> a broad range of<br />

products. So it is very likely that there will always be some ambiguity <strong>in</strong><br />

regulative frameworks based on EU directives.<br />

(3) Regulative frameworks usually leave decisions to be made by the <strong>design</strong><br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers <strong>and</strong> are there<strong>for</strong>e not pragmatically complete. It is impossible to<br />

prescribe every little detail of a <strong>design</strong> even if this was the idea beh<strong>in</strong>d the EU<br />

directives.<br />

On these grounds it can be expected that <strong>in</strong> general, although a regulative<br />

framework will be available <strong>for</strong> normal <strong>design</strong>s, such a framework will probably<br />

not meet Grunwald’s requirements.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!