27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DutchEVO, safe or susta<strong>in</strong>able?<br />

Thomas: ‘You have to challenge regulations; regulations do tend to lag<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d.’<br />

Some regulations were used to guide the <strong>design</strong> process <strong>and</strong> were seen by the<br />

team members as someth<strong>in</strong>g that smart people had worked on <strong>for</strong> a long time,<br />

so they should strive to comply with the regulations. For example the regulations<br />

on light<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> view angles should be met accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>design</strong> team. The<br />

<strong>design</strong> team also thought that <strong>for</strong> a concept car to be realistic most regulations<br />

should be taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />

Dave: ‘regulations give guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>for</strong> the <strong>design</strong> process…… They give<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> we want a realistic car so you take them [regulations] as<br />

a guidel<strong>in</strong>e, you could take someth<strong>in</strong>g else but you want to be realistic<br />

<strong>and</strong> this is easy <strong>and</strong> well documented.’<br />

However, some regulations were regarded as silly or not effective <strong>and</strong> the team<br />

felt that regulations should be challenged. This was the case with crash safety<br />

regulations. The team thought that the obligatory crash tests were <strong>in</strong>efficient.<br />

Most actual crashes do not resemble the prescribed crash tests. A lot of fatalities<br />

are due to speed<strong>in</strong>g on roads <strong>and</strong> crash<strong>in</strong>g at a speed of about 80 km/h or more<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a tree or lamp post or other solid object. The st<strong>and</strong>ard crash test at 64 km/h<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a wall is very different from a crash <strong>in</strong>to a tree. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>design</strong> team<br />

challeng<strong>in</strong>g crash safety regulations can only be done us<strong>in</strong>g very good<br />

argumentation.<br />

4.4 Light throw away after use?<br />

The def<strong>in</strong>ition used by the <strong>design</strong> team <strong>for</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability is that of the World<br />

Commission on Environment <strong>and</strong> Development, the Brundtl<strong>and</strong>-commission<br />

[WCED, 1987]. This commission def<strong>in</strong>ed susta<strong>in</strong>able development as a<br />

development that meets the needs of the present generation without<br />

compromis<strong>in</strong>g the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Two<br />

th<strong>in</strong>gs are important <strong>in</strong> this def<strong>in</strong>ition.<br />

1. The concept of ‘needs’, refers <strong>in</strong> particular to the essential needs of the<br />

world’s poor, to which overrid<strong>in</strong>g priority should be given.<br />

2. The idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology <strong>and</strong> social<br />

organisation on the environment’s ability to meet present <strong>and</strong> future<br />

needs.<br />

The choice <strong>for</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of susta<strong>in</strong>ability is not ethically neutral<br />

because such a choice implies a choice to <strong>in</strong>clude some th<strong>in</strong>gs as part of a<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!