27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 Conclusions of the empirical study<br />

In this chapter conclusions are drawn based on the four case-studies with regard<br />

to the work<strong>in</strong>g hypotheses that were <strong>for</strong>mulated <strong>in</strong> chapter 3 <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />

These work<strong>in</strong>g hypotheses were:<br />

1a) The k<strong>in</strong>ds of ethical <strong>issues</strong> faced by eng<strong>in</strong>eers depend on <strong>design</strong> type<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>design</strong> hierarchy.<br />

1b) The ways <strong>in</strong> which eng<strong>in</strong>eers deal with these ethical <strong>issues</strong> depend on<br />

<strong>design</strong> type <strong>and</strong> <strong>design</strong> hierarchy.<br />

2a) In normal <strong>design</strong> processes a regulative framework is used by<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers to account <strong>for</strong> the decisions made on ethical <strong>issues</strong>.<br />

2b) This regulative framework fulfils all Grunwald’s requirements <strong>and</strong> is<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e a normative framework.<br />

The results from the cases are first summarized <strong>in</strong> section 8.1. Subsequently the<br />

empirical data with regard to work<strong>in</strong>g hypothesis 1a are discussed <strong>in</strong> section 8.2.<br />

It is argued that the empirical data only partly support this work<strong>in</strong>g hypothesis.<br />

Contrary to what was expected the <strong>design</strong> hierarchy does not seem to <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

the k<strong>in</strong>ds of ethical <strong>issues</strong>. These <strong>issues</strong> only depend on <strong>design</strong> type. It will be<br />

shown that the empirical data only support a part of hypothesis 1b <strong>in</strong> section 8.3.<br />

The way eng<strong>in</strong>eers deal with ethical <strong>issues</strong> depends on <strong>design</strong> type <strong>and</strong> aga<strong>in</strong> no<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence of <strong>design</strong> hierarchy was seen. It will also be argued that the empirical<br />

data are <strong>in</strong> accord with work<strong>in</strong>g hypothesis 2a. Eng<strong>in</strong>eers use a regulative<br />

framework to deal with ethical <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> normal <strong>design</strong>. They do not use<br />

regulative frameworks <strong>in</strong> radical <strong>design</strong>. The regulative frameworks encountered<br />

<strong>in</strong> this thesis do not fulfil Grunwald’s requirements. So work<strong>in</strong>g hypothesis 2b is<br />

not confirmed by the empirical data. This will be argued <strong>in</strong> section 8.4. Until<br />

now, I have considered the <strong>design</strong> problem <strong>for</strong>mulation to be given fact <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>design</strong> processes. I discuss this assumption <strong>in</strong> section 8.5 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicate that the<br />

<strong>design</strong> problem <strong>for</strong>mulation is not completely fixed <strong>and</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers have ways to<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence the <strong>design</strong> problem <strong>for</strong>mulation. This is highly relevant from an<br />

ethical po<strong>in</strong>t of view because the problem def<strong>in</strong>ition determ<strong>in</strong>es the <strong>design</strong> type.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, an attempt is made to generalise the results from the cases <strong>in</strong> section<br />

8.6, this generalisation is done on empirical <strong>and</strong> conceptual grounds.<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!