Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />
customer had a <strong>design</strong> problem <strong>for</strong>mulation <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some requirements<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e hir<strong>in</strong>g an eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g company to make the <strong>design</strong>. This <strong>design</strong> problem<br />
<strong>for</strong>mulation may be changed dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>design</strong> but only <strong>in</strong> co-operation with the<br />
customer. In the case-studies some decisions, especially those related to what<br />
code to use <strong>in</strong> normal <strong>design</strong>, were made by the customer. In the bridge case,<br />
the <strong>design</strong> team advised the customer with respect to choos<strong>in</strong>g between the NEN<br />
<strong>and</strong> European codes. In the pip<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> equipment case, the customer could<br />
choose between several European codes if the <strong>in</strong>stallation was to be built <strong>in</strong> the<br />
EU. In the trailer case, the <strong>for</strong>mulation of requirements <strong>and</strong> the first<br />
operationalisation of those requirements were done <strong>in</strong> co-operation with the<br />
customer. Further operationalisations that required more specialist knowledge<br />
were done by the eng<strong>in</strong>eers.<br />
Organisations that have to issue permits or certify the <strong>design</strong> may be <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
<strong>in</strong> the normal <strong>design</strong> processes. Advice could be sought from these<br />
organisations. In the normal <strong>design</strong> cases, the decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
approaches there<strong>for</strong>e <strong>in</strong>cluded eng<strong>in</strong>eers, customer(s) <strong>and</strong> certify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
organisations. The certify<strong>in</strong>g organisations were not <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the radical<br />
<strong>design</strong> processes. It should be realised, however, that if a radical <strong>design</strong> is to be<br />
produced <strong>and</strong> sold then it has to obta<strong>in</strong> a CE mark. So, <strong>in</strong> radical <strong>design</strong><br />
processes, certify<strong>in</strong>g organisations may play a role <strong>in</strong> the last phases of a <strong>design</strong><br />
processes. The radical <strong>design</strong>s studied <strong>for</strong> this research were not <strong>in</strong> the last<br />
phases. The lightweight car of the DutchEVO project was not <strong>design</strong>ed to<br />
produce a production model car. The trailer could have been produced <strong>and</strong> sold<br />
but the <strong>design</strong> process was stopped by the customer after the feasibility <strong>and</strong><br />
prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>design</strong> phase.<br />
The <strong>design</strong> processes were organised <strong>in</strong> the normal <strong>design</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> such a way<br />
that <strong>in</strong>dividual eng<strong>in</strong>eers were confronted with ethical <strong>issues</strong> depend<strong>in</strong>g on their<br />
role <strong>in</strong> the <strong>design</strong> process. In a normal <strong>design</strong> case the ethical <strong>issues</strong> could be<br />
decided on by an <strong>in</strong>dividual eng<strong>in</strong>eer <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g a part of the product. Decisions<br />
on ethical <strong>issues</strong> were made collectively <strong>in</strong> the radical <strong>design</strong>s. The <strong>design</strong> team<br />
discussed the ethical <strong>issues</strong> <strong>and</strong>, although a s<strong>in</strong>gle eng<strong>in</strong>eer might have prepared<br />
the discussion, the decision was ultimately made by the <strong>design</strong> team. In the<br />
cases where a <strong>design</strong> was made <strong>for</strong> a customer, the customer was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions on some of the ethical <strong>issues</strong>, while certify<strong>in</strong>g organisation<br />
could be asked <strong>for</strong> advice <strong>in</strong> normal <strong>design</strong> cases.<br />
164