27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />

customer had a <strong>design</strong> problem <strong>for</strong>mulation <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some requirements<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e hir<strong>in</strong>g an eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g company to make the <strong>design</strong>. This <strong>design</strong> problem<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulation may be changed dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>design</strong> but only <strong>in</strong> co-operation with the<br />

customer. In the case-studies some decisions, especially those related to what<br />

code to use <strong>in</strong> normal <strong>design</strong>, were made by the customer. In the bridge case,<br />

the <strong>design</strong> team advised the customer with respect to choos<strong>in</strong>g between the NEN<br />

<strong>and</strong> European codes. In the pip<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> equipment case, the customer could<br />

choose between several European codes if the <strong>in</strong>stallation was to be built <strong>in</strong> the<br />

EU. In the trailer case, the <strong>for</strong>mulation of requirements <strong>and</strong> the first<br />

operationalisation of those requirements were done <strong>in</strong> co-operation with the<br />

customer. Further operationalisations that required more specialist knowledge<br />

were done by the eng<strong>in</strong>eers.<br />

Organisations that have to issue permits or certify the <strong>design</strong> may be <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> the normal <strong>design</strong> processes. Advice could be sought from these<br />

organisations. In the normal <strong>design</strong> cases, the decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approaches there<strong>for</strong>e <strong>in</strong>cluded eng<strong>in</strong>eers, customer(s) <strong>and</strong> certify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

organisations. The certify<strong>in</strong>g organisations were not <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the radical<br />

<strong>design</strong> processes. It should be realised, however, that if a radical <strong>design</strong> is to be<br />

produced <strong>and</strong> sold then it has to obta<strong>in</strong> a CE mark. So, <strong>in</strong> radical <strong>design</strong><br />

processes, certify<strong>in</strong>g organisations may play a role <strong>in</strong> the last phases of a <strong>design</strong><br />

processes. The radical <strong>design</strong>s studied <strong>for</strong> this research were not <strong>in</strong> the last<br />

phases. The lightweight car of the DutchEVO project was not <strong>design</strong>ed to<br />

produce a production model car. The trailer could have been produced <strong>and</strong> sold<br />

but the <strong>design</strong> process was stopped by the customer after the feasibility <strong>and</strong><br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>design</strong> phase.<br />

The <strong>design</strong> processes were organised <strong>in</strong> the normal <strong>design</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> such a way<br />

that <strong>in</strong>dividual eng<strong>in</strong>eers were confronted with ethical <strong>issues</strong> depend<strong>in</strong>g on their<br />

role <strong>in</strong> the <strong>design</strong> process. In a normal <strong>design</strong> case the ethical <strong>issues</strong> could be<br />

decided on by an <strong>in</strong>dividual eng<strong>in</strong>eer <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g a part of the product. Decisions<br />

on ethical <strong>issues</strong> were made collectively <strong>in</strong> the radical <strong>design</strong>s. The <strong>design</strong> team<br />

discussed the ethical <strong>issues</strong> <strong>and</strong>, although a s<strong>in</strong>gle eng<strong>in</strong>eer might have prepared<br />

the discussion, the decision was ultimately made by the <strong>design</strong> team. In the<br />

cases where a <strong>design</strong> was made <strong>for</strong> a customer, the customer was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions on some of the ethical <strong>issues</strong>, while certify<strong>in</strong>g organisation<br />

could be asked <strong>for</strong> advice <strong>in</strong> normal <strong>design</strong> cases.<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!