Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />
operation with the students at the start of their master’s or bachelor’s thesis<br />
project. The task descriptions consisted of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about the goals the<br />
student was expected to achieve, a time schedule <strong>and</strong> the names of the<br />
supervisors. The partition<strong>in</strong>g of the <strong>design</strong> process <strong>in</strong>to a lot of small projects<br />
assigned to different persons seemed to diffuse the responsibility that people felt<br />
<strong>for</strong> the project <strong>and</strong> its completion. Students only felt responsible <strong>for</strong> the part they<br />
were <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Dave, Ed, Pete <strong>and</strong> Thomas <strong>in</strong> contrast to advisors <strong>and</strong> students, had vague<br />
task descriptions, as a result it was not obvious to the other team members what<br />
their task was: they seemed to feel responsible <strong>for</strong> the whole project.<br />
Thomas, Pete <strong>and</strong> Charlie stated <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews that they felt responsible <strong>for</strong><br />
communication between all the team members. It was very important that the<br />
different team members communicated with each other. Decisions made<br />
concern<strong>in</strong>g one part of the car <strong>in</strong>fluenced how other parts of the car should be<br />
<strong>design</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> because of the rapid changes <strong>in</strong> the composition of the team, it<br />
was difficult to keep track of who was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g what part. In the<br />
time that Charlie was do<strong>in</strong>g his master’s thesis project the team communicated<br />
more often. Team members knew what the others were do<strong>in</strong>g; there were<br />
discussions on a lot of subjects. This was not completely due to Charlie but he<br />
played a large part <strong>in</strong> facilitat<strong>in</strong>g this communication. Around the time that<br />
Charlie f<strong>in</strong>ished his master’s thesis some staff members decided that all the<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>gs were cost<strong>in</strong>g too much time <strong>and</strong> the team meet<strong>in</strong>gs ceased to be<br />
organised regularly. Without regular meet<strong>in</strong>gs only Thomas <strong>and</strong> Dave had an<br />
overview of what was go<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>in</strong> the project.<br />
4.2.1 ‘If you have thought it through then it is ok’<br />
There was no <strong>for</strong>mal decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g structure. Team members could decide<br />
<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mally on details themselves. These details were presented to the other team<br />
members <strong>in</strong> presentations <strong>and</strong> <strong>design</strong> team members could comment on them.<br />
Larger <strong>issues</strong> were discussed with the team.<br />
56<br />
William: ‘As far as I know, I calculate or <strong>design</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> discuss<br />
that with Dave <strong>and</strong> Ed. If they do not have problems with it then it is<br />
decided.’<br />
Charlie: ‘We decided on some rough ideas together. I have made<br />
choices <strong>in</strong> consultation with the other team members.’<br />
To be part of the decision mak<strong>in</strong>g process it was necessary to be <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med<br />
about which decisions were go<strong>in</strong>g to be made based on what <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation. How<br />
well team members were <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med their colleagues, about what