Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Design of a lightweight trailer<br />
tonnes <strong>and</strong> the truck 6.5 tonnes, this leaves 44 - 5.5 -6.5 = 32 tonnes <strong>for</strong> the load<br />
to be transported.<br />
The load scenarios changed dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>design</strong> process, <strong>and</strong> the trailer <strong>and</strong> the<br />
load scenarios appeared to be <strong>design</strong>ed simultaneously. The load scenarios that<br />
were assumed <strong>in</strong> the first f<strong>in</strong>ite element calculations were the follow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Load on the floor: 32 tonnes, dynamic factor 2 <strong>and</strong> safety factor 1,5 makes 32<br />
tonnes x 3g<br />
Load on the floor <strong>and</strong> pressure on the side panels: floor 32 tonnes x 3g plus a<br />
hydrostatic pressure on the side panels of “density of the s<strong>and</strong>” x “the height”<br />
x g<br />
Turn<strong>in</strong>g a corner: as a trailer takes a corner the pile of s<strong>and</strong> is subjected to a<br />
gravitational field of 32 tonnes x 3g on floor <strong>and</strong> 32 tonnes x 3g on the side<br />
panel<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g these load scenarios, calculations were made us<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>ite element<br />
model. These calculations led to surpris<strong>in</strong>g results: the pressure on the side<br />
panels would lead to a 40 cm of displacement if carry<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>and</strong>! Turn<strong>in</strong>g a corner<br />
would lead to a displacement of 5 m <strong>in</strong> the side panels. Liz <strong>and</strong> Hans concluded<br />
that the load scenarios were not realistic <strong>and</strong> too severe.<br />
Hans: ‘The <strong>design</strong> problem will succeed or fail with these load<br />
scenarios. Could we not use the same load scenarios as the customer<br />
used when <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g an alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer?’<br />
Liz: ‘That’s the problem. They are not able to deliver load scenarios.<br />
We will use the ones we have used <strong>in</strong> other projects.’<br />
Hans: ‘There have been load scenarios made <strong>for</strong> other projects, but we<br />
have to know what the customer does with his alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer. If<br />
you want to be smart you have to change the load scenarios, otherwise<br />
we will not get the 10% mass reduction.’<br />
Liz: ‘But the customer cannot give me any load scenarios, not even <strong>for</strong><br />
the alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer they produce now.’<br />
Hans: ‘The risk is that the customer built the alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer based<br />
on experience. He has learnt that he can reduce the material thickness<br />
because it doesn’t fail. This also happened <strong>in</strong> a yacht build<strong>in</strong>g project.<br />
The load scenarios that we have used <strong>for</strong> our calculations are much too<br />
severe, this will lead to extra mass <strong>in</strong> the <strong>design</strong>. We can say that the<br />
material is necessary because we have calculated that there is a need,<br />
but probably hav<strong>in</strong>g used too severe load scenarios.’<br />
Liz: ‘We could f<strong>in</strong>d out what our concept does <strong>in</strong> comparison with the<br />
strength <strong>and</strong> stiffness of the exist<strong>in</strong>g alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer.’<br />
137