Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />
responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>stallation that is complete <strong>in</strong> details <strong>and</strong> which is<br />
producible <strong>in</strong> practice? If an eng<strong>in</strong>eer specifies a certa<strong>in</strong> way of construction that<br />
is difficult <strong>and</strong> labour <strong>in</strong>tensive, the constructor might use an easier way to<br />
produce someth<strong>in</strong>g that he or she judges to be similar or good enough.<br />
However, such changes may not be as good as those prescribed <strong>and</strong> may not<br />
achieve what the <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>eers expected, this can lead to problems later.<br />
There are several cases <strong>in</strong> which details that were changed or further <strong>design</strong>ed<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g construction, have led to disasters, <strong>for</strong> example, the Hyatt Regency<br />
walkway collapse (see also [Gillum, 2000] <strong>and</strong> [Pfatteicher, 2000]).<br />
Some of the alterations that might be made are predictable <strong>for</strong> the eng<strong>in</strong>eers.<br />
Should the eng<strong>in</strong>eer <strong>design</strong> <strong>in</strong> a way that is easy to construct <strong>and</strong> anticipate the<br />
sometimes difficult work<strong>in</strong>g conditions of, <strong>for</strong> example, welders? Or should an<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer <strong>design</strong> the best construction <strong>and</strong> then give his or her draw<strong>in</strong>gs to the<br />
contractor? An eng<strong>in</strong>eer can argue that he or she does not have all the relevant<br />
<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation to decide what is easy to construct <strong>and</strong> what not. The eng<strong>in</strong>eer does<br />
not always know what production techniques the specific contractor has available<br />
<strong>and</strong> has experience with. Not <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some details <strong>in</strong> the draw<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> lett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the construction company decide on some details might tempt eng<strong>in</strong>eers to leave<br />
the difficult details out (see figure 5.1).<br />
88<br />
Figure 5.1:…..<strong>and</strong> this pipe should be connected to that pressure vessel<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to the draw<strong>in</strong>gs? [picture courtesy of S. Roeser]