Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Ethical</strong> <strong>issues</strong> <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong><br />
138<br />
Hans: ‘Then you should do both calculations. Make the calculations<br />
<strong>for</strong> their alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> our concept <strong>and</strong> compare them.’<br />
The displacement of the floor was 34,5 mm, which was too much accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
the eng<strong>in</strong>eers’ self imposed requirement <strong>for</strong> a maximum of 20 mm. A discussion<br />
was started as to whether this should be local bend<strong>in</strong>g of the floor or the total<br />
displacement of the floor with regard to the <strong>in</strong>itial unloaded situation. At the end<br />
of this discussion it was decided that the safety factor of 1,5 should not be<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded. The safety factor was used to get from limit to ultimate load <strong>and</strong> the<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eers seemed to change their m<strong>in</strong>ds about what load to use <strong>in</strong> the load<br />
scenarios. At first the eng<strong>in</strong>eers calculated the displacement of the floor us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ultimate load <strong>and</strong> then they decided to use limit load. They argued that the<br />
displacement is one of the stiffness requirements <strong>and</strong> these should always be<br />
calculated us<strong>in</strong>g limit load. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Liz <strong>and</strong> Hans a structure is allowed to<br />
fail to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent at ultimate load, so ultimate load is way too severe <strong>for</strong> a<br />
stiffness requirement. The use of limit <strong>in</strong>stead of ultimate load reduced the<br />
displacement of the floor to 34,5 : 1,5= 23 mm (calculations were l<strong>in</strong>ear elastic),<br />
which was much closer to the required maximum of 20 mm.<br />
The safety factor, 1,5, was also removed from the load scenario <strong>for</strong> turn<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
corner, but the displacement of the side panels rema<strong>in</strong>ed more than 1 m.<br />
Subsequently, the dynamic factor (2) was also removed from the scenario but the<br />
displacement rema<strong>in</strong>ed at about a meter. Liz <strong>and</strong> Hans started to doubt whether<br />
it was realistic to assume that the complete load of s<strong>and</strong> will push aga<strong>in</strong>st the side<br />
panel. After the discussions the load scenarios were changed to the follow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Load on the floor: 32 tonnes, dynamic factor 2 makes 32 tonnes x 2g<br />
Load on the floor <strong>and</strong> pressure on the side panels: floor 32 tonnes x 2g <strong>and</strong><br />
hydrostatic pressure on the side panels “density of the s<strong>and</strong>” x “the height” x<br />
g<br />
Turn<strong>in</strong>g a corner: dur<strong>in</strong>g turn<strong>in</strong>g a corner the pile of s<strong>and</strong> is with<strong>in</strong> a gravitational<br />
field, 32 tonnes x 1g on the floor <strong>and</strong> on the side panel<br />
Torsion: a torsion moment of 1 Nmm will be used<br />
As can be seen <strong>in</strong> the previous quote Liz <strong>and</strong> Hans also decided to make a f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
element model of the exist<strong>in</strong>g alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer <strong>for</strong> comparison. These above<br />
load scenarios were used to calculate the displacements <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>ite element<br />
models of the exist<strong>in</strong>g alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> the concept composite trailer.<br />
The load scenario turn<strong>in</strong>g a corner still led to extreme displacements of the side<br />
panels, 290 mm <strong>in</strong> the alum<strong>in</strong>ium trailer <strong>and</strong> 770 mm <strong>in</strong> the concept trailer. The<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eers started th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about whether the trailer would roll over when the