27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Design of a lightweight trailer<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers, they should always ask whether a customer knows about problems<br />

with the production or use of their products. Sometimes the CLC eng<strong>in</strong>eers will<br />

have more experience with a product because of hav<strong>in</strong>g made previous <strong>design</strong>s<br />

<strong>for</strong> similar products. In these cases the eng<strong>in</strong>eers mention problems<br />

encountered <strong>in</strong> earlier <strong>design</strong> projects. However, the customer is responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

the requirements <strong>and</strong> should <strong>in</strong>dicate what problems might arise <strong>in</strong> use <strong>and</strong><br />

misuse situations. In this case-study, the customer had <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />

overload<strong>in</strong>g might occur but he never changed the requirements. The eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

thought that chang<strong>in</strong>g the requirements to <strong>in</strong>clude overload<strong>in</strong>g was the<br />

customer’s responsibility. The eng<strong>in</strong>eers did not know whether overload<strong>in</strong>g<br />

caused problems <strong>for</strong> the customer. So although overload<strong>in</strong>g was mentioned on<br />

occasions, the requirements were not changed because the eng<strong>in</strong>eers expected<br />

the customer to change the requirements if necessary. The customer did not<br />

change the requirements to <strong>in</strong>clude overload<strong>in</strong>g because he preferred to test a<br />

prototype to break<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

The eng<strong>in</strong>eers would only <strong>in</strong>corporate the legal requirements on traffic safety <strong>in</strong><br />

a further phase of the <strong>design</strong> process. The customer thought that the sides<br />

needed to be covered <strong>and</strong> that underrun protection needed to be <strong>in</strong>stalled. The<br />

reasons he gave were that he thought that this would look good <strong>and</strong> that traffic<br />

safety was a good market<strong>in</strong>g tool. Because the customer considered the side<br />

covers to be part of the image of the trailer <strong>and</strong> not part of the structure he did<br />

not <strong>in</strong>clude this <strong>in</strong> the list of requirements, nor was it part of his negotiations<br />

with the eng<strong>in</strong>eers. He asked the eng<strong>in</strong>eers to make a reliable structure <strong>and</strong><br />

considered that the image of the trailer was quite another issue that he would<br />

deal with after a structural <strong>design</strong> had been obta<strong>in</strong>ed. 10<br />

The eng<strong>in</strong>eers did not th<strong>in</strong>k that they were responsible <strong>for</strong> traffic safety, they<br />

deemed themselves only responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>design</strong><strong>in</strong>g a manoeuvrable, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

normal use, structurally reliable trailer. They thought that the customer was<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g the relevant <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on experiences from practice.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the eng<strong>in</strong>eers, the government is responsible <strong>for</strong> traffic safety <strong>and</strong><br />

should provide adequate regulation <strong>for</strong> traffic safety. The driver of a truck <strong>and</strong><br />

trailer comb<strong>in</strong>ations has the responsibility to drive with care. Although the<br />

customer thought that traffic safety was important he did not require the<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers to consider it because he saw it as someth<strong>in</strong>g completely separate<br />

——————————————————————————————————<br />

10 Note that a lightweight trailer was <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>and</strong> that add<strong>in</strong>g covers onto a structurally reliable<br />

trailer adds material <strong>and</strong> mass that is not used to support loads. Usually <strong>in</strong> lightweight <strong>design</strong><br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers try to prevent the use of extra materials <strong>in</strong> places where they do not bear loads or<br />

where there is already enough material to support the loads.<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!